Thaden Joshua T, Li Yanhong, Ruffin Felicia, Maskarinec Stacey A, Hill-Rorie Jonathan M, Wanda Lisa C, Reed Shelby D, Fowler Vance G
Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Feb 23;61(3). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01709-16. Print 2017 Mar.
The clinical and economic impacts of bloodstream infections (BSI) due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria are incompletely understood. From 2009 to 2015, all adult inpatients with Gram-negative BSI at our institution were prospectively enrolled. MDR status was defined as resistance to ≥3 antibiotic classes. Clinical outcomes and inpatient costs associated with the MDR phenotype were identified. Among 891 unique patients with Gram-negative BSI, 292 (33%) were infected with MDR bacteria. In an adjusted analysis, only history of Gram-negative infection was associated with MDR BSI versus non-MDR BSI (odds ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 2.16; = 0.002). Patients with MDR BSI had increased BSI recurrence (1.7% [5/292] versus 0.2% [1/599]; = 0.02) and longer hospital stay (median, 10.0 versus 8.0 days; = 0.0005). Unadjusted rates of in-hospital mortality did not significantly differ between MDR (26.4% [77/292]) and non-MDR (21.7% [130/599]) groups ( = 0.12). Unadjusted mean costs were 1.62 times higher in MDR than in non-MDR BSI ($59,266 versus $36,452; = 0.003). This finding persisted after adjustment for patient factors and appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy (means ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.36; = 0.01). Adjusted analysis of patient subpopulations revealed that the increased cost of MDR BSI occurred primarily among patients with hospital-acquired infections (MDR means ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.82; = 0.008). MDR Gram-negative BSI are associated with recurrent BSI, longer hospital stays, and increased mean inpatient costs. MDR BSI in patients with hospital-acquired infections primarily account for the increased cost.
多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌引起的血流感染(BSI)的临床和经济影响尚未完全明确。2009年至2015年,我们机构对所有成年革兰氏阴性菌血流感染住院患者进行了前瞻性登记。多重耐药状态定义为对≥3类抗生素耐药。确定了与多重耐药表型相关的临床结局和住院费用。在891例独特的革兰氏阴性菌血流感染患者中,292例(33%)感染了多重耐药菌。在一项校正分析中,只有革兰氏阴性菌感染史与多重耐药菌血流感染和非多重耐药菌血流感染相关(比值比,1.60;95%置信区间[CI],1.19至2.16;P = 0.002)。多重耐药菌血流感染患者的血流感染复发率增加(1.7%[5/292]对0.2%[1/599];P = 0.02),住院时间延长(中位数,10.0天对8.0天;P = 0.0005)。多重耐药组(26.4%[77/292])和非多重耐药组(21.7%[130/599])的未校正院内死亡率无显著差异(P = 0.12)。未校正的平均费用,多重耐药菌血流感染患者比非多重耐药菌血流感染患者高1.62倍(59,266美元对36,452美元;P = 0.003)。在对患者因素和适当的经验性抗生素治疗进行校正后,这一发现仍然存在(均值比,1.18;95%CI,1.03至1.36;P = 0.01)。对患者亚组的校正分析显示,多重耐药菌血流感染增加的费用主要发生在医院获得性感染患者中(多重耐药菌均值比,1.41;95%CI,1.10至1.82;P = 0.008)。多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌血流感染与血流感染复发、住院时间延长和平均住院费用增加相关。医院获得性感染患者的多重耐药菌血流感染是费用增加的主要原因。