Pinto Eduardo, Brito António Carvalho, Cruz-Correia Ricardo João
Eduardo Pinto, INESC TEC, Campus da FEUP, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200 - 465 Porto, Portugal, Email:
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Dec 21;7(4):1202-1220. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-08-RA-0135.
To understand and build a collective vision of all existing institutions in the Portuguese National Health Service as well as to perceive how and how far the interaction between those multiple institutions is supported by Information Systems (IS).
Upon identification of the institutions involved in the healthcare process, a set of interviews with experienced people from those institutions was conducted, which produced about five hours of tape. The research was focused exclusively on processes involving two different organizations and any internal processes were altogether excluded from it.
The study allowed the identification of about 50 recurrent interaction processes, which were classified into four different varieties in accordance with the nature of the information flow: administrative, clinical, identificational and statistical. In addition, these processes were divided in accordance with the way how that integration is achieved, from completely automated to email or telephone-based.
Funds/Money related processes are technologically more rigid and standardized, whereas auditing and inspection ones are less supported by automatic systems. There emerged an interesting level of sharing and integration in clinical processes, although the integration is mostly made at the interface level. The authors identified 5 particularly relevant and dominant actors (2 classes of individuals and 3 institutions) with which there is a need for coordination and cooperation. The authors consider that, in future works, an effort should be made to provide the various institutions with guidelines/interfaces and prompt such institutions to elaborate upon these.
了解并构建葡萄牙国家医疗服务体系中所有现有机构的共同愿景,以及了解这些多个机构之间的互动如何以及在多大程度上得到信息系统(IS)的支持。
在确定参与医疗过程的机构后,对这些机构中有经验的人员进行了一系列访谈,录制了约五个小时的录音带。该研究仅专注于涉及两个不同组织的流程,任何内部流程都完全被排除在外。
该研究确定了约50个反复出现的互动流程,根据信息流的性质将其分为四种不同类型:行政、临床、识别和统计。此外,这些流程根据实现整合的方式进行划分,从完全自动化到基于电子邮件或电话的方式。
与资金/金钱相关的流程在技术上更加严格和标准化,而审计和检查流程则较少得到自动系统的支持。临床流程中出现了有趣的共享和整合水平,尽管整合大多在接口层面进行。作者确定了5个特别相关且占主导地位的行为者(2类个人和3个机构),需要与之进行协调与合作。作者认为,在未来的工作中,应努力为各机构提供指导方针/接口,并促使这些机构对此进行详细阐述。