Taneja Sunil, Tohra Sunil, Duseja Ajay, Dhiman Radha Krishan, Chawla Yogesh Kumar
Department of Hepatology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2016 Dec;6(4):282-290. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
Liver fibrosis and its sequel cirrhosis represent a major health care burden, and assessment of fibrosis by biopsy is gradually being replaced by noninvasive methods. In clinical practice, the determination of fibrosis stage is important, since patients with advanced fibrosis have faster progression to cirrhosis and antiviral therapy is indicated in these patients.
To assess the role of transient elastography (TE) and compare it with APRI and FIB4 for predicting liver fibrosis and assessing the effect of host and viral factors on fibrosis and treatment outcome in CHC patients.
In a retrospective analysis, 330 CHC patients underwent liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by TE and tests needed for calculating APRI and FIB4 scores at baseline. 228 patients received a combination of Pegylated IFN-based antiviral therapy and were analyzed for therapeutic response.
The study included 330 patients (median age 39 years [range 18-67]), predominantly males ( = 227, 68.8%) with baseline LSMs. The median liver stiffness was 7.8 kPa (range 3.2-69.1 kPa). LSMs and its thresholds for severe fibrosis progression (≥9.5 kPa) and cirrhosis (≥12.5 kPa) were significantly higher in patients with age ≥40 years, diabetes mellitus, and patients with significant alcohol intake ( = 0.003 to < 0.001). By taking TE as a reference, the diagnostic accuracy of FIB4 scores for predicting cirrhosis (AUROC 0.896) was good (+LR 13.4) compared to APRI (AUROC 0.823) with moderate likelihood ratio (+LR 6.9). Among 228 treated patients the SVR rate in genotype 3 was 70% versus 57.8% in genotype 1. Fibrosis score F4 ( = 0.023) and HCV genotype ( = 0.008) were independent predictors of SVR.
The study shows that LSM by TE and fibrosis assessment by FIB4/APRI scores can be used with fair reliability to predict fibrosis and treatment response in patients with CHC infection.
肝纤维化及其后续的肝硬化是主要的医疗负担,通过活检评估纤维化正逐渐被非侵入性方法所取代。在临床实践中,确定纤维化阶段很重要,因为晚期纤维化患者发展为肝硬化的速度更快,这些患者需要进行抗病毒治疗。
评估瞬时弹性成像(TE)的作用,并将其与APRI和FIB4进行比较,以预测慢性丙型肝炎(CHC)患者的肝纤维化,并评估宿主和病毒因素对纤维化及治疗结果的影响。
在一项回顾性分析中,330例CHC患者在基线时接受了通过TE进行的肝脏硬度测量(LSM)以及计算APRI和FIB4评分所需的检测。228例患者接受了基于聚乙二醇化干扰素的抗病毒联合治疗,并对治疗反应进行了分析。
该研究纳入了330例患者(中位年龄39岁[范围18 - 67岁]),主要为男性(n = 227,68.8%),有基线LSM数据。中位肝脏硬度为7.8 kPa(范围3.2 - 69.1 kPa)。年龄≥40岁、患有糖尿病以及大量饮酒的患者,其LSM及其严重纤维化进展(≥9.5 kPa)和肝硬化(≥12.5 kPa)的阈值显著更高(P = 0.003至P < 0.001)。以TE为参考,与APRI(AUROC为0.823,阳性似然比[+LR]为6.9)相比,FIB4评分预测肝硬化的诊断准确性良好(AUROC为0.896,+LR为13.4)。在228例接受治疗的患者中,基因3型的持续病毒学应答(SVR)率为70%,而基因1型为57.8%。纤维化评分F4(P = 0.023)和HCV基因型(P = 0.008)是SVR的独立预测因素。
该研究表明,通过TE进行LSM以及通过FIB4/APRI评分进行纤维化评估可较为可靠地用于预测CHC感染患者的纤维化及治疗反应。