Richard Angélique, Boullu Loïs, Herbach Ulysse, Bonnafoux Arnaud, Morin Valérie, Vallin Elodie, Guillemin Anissa, Papili Gao Nan, Gunawan Rudiyanto, Cosette Jérémie, Arnaud Ophélie, Kupiec Jean-Jacques, Espinasse Thibault, Gonin-Giraud Sandrine, Gandrillon Olivier
Univ Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, INSERM U1210, Laboratory of Biology and Modelling of the Cell, 46 allée d'Italie Site Jacques Monod, F-69007, Lyon, France.
Inria Team Dracula, Inria Center Grenoble Rhône-Alpes, France.
PLoS Biol. 2016 Dec 27;14(12):e1002585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002585. eCollection 2016 Dec.
In some recent studies, a view emerged that stochastic dynamics governing the switching of cells from one differentiation state to another could be characterized by a peak in gene expression variability at the point of fate commitment. We have tested this hypothesis at the single-cell level by analyzing primary chicken erythroid progenitors through their differentiation process and measuring the expression of selected genes at six sequential time-points after induction of differentiation. In contrast to population-based expression data, single-cell gene expression data revealed a high cell-to-cell variability, which was masked by averaging. We were able to show that the correlation network was a very dynamical entity and that a subgroup of genes tend to follow the predictions from the dynamical network biomarker (DNB) theory. In addition, we also identified a small group of functionally related genes encoding proteins involved in sterol synthesis that could act as the initial drivers of the differentiation. In order to assess quantitatively the cell-to-cell variability in gene expression and its evolution in time, we used Shannon entropy as a measure of the heterogeneity. Entropy values showed a significant increase in the first 8 h of the differentiation process, reaching a peak between 8 and 24 h, before decreasing to significantly lower values. Moreover, we observed that the previous point of maximum entropy precedes two paramount key points: an irreversible commitment to differentiation between 24 and 48 h followed by a significant increase in cell size variability at 48 h. In conclusion, when analyzed at the single cell level, the differentiation process looks very different from its classical population average view. New observables (like entropy) can be computed, the behavior of which is fully compatible with the idea that differentiation is not a "simple" program that all cells execute identically but results from the dynamical behavior of the underlying molecular network.
在最近的一些研究中,出现了一种观点,即控制细胞从一种分化状态转变为另一种分化状态的随机动力学可以通过命运承诺点处基因表达变异性的峰值来表征。我们通过分析原代鸡红细胞祖细胞的分化过程,并在诱导分化后的六个连续时间点测量选定基因的表达,在单细胞水平上对这一假设进行了检验。与基于群体的表达数据不同,单细胞基因表达数据显示出高细胞间变异性,这种变异性在平均过程中被掩盖了。我们能够证明相关网络是一个非常动态的实体,并且有一组基因倾向于遵循动态网络生物标志物(DNB)理论的预测。此外,我们还鉴定出一小群功能相关的基因,它们编码参与甾醇合成的蛋白质,这些基因可能作为分化的初始驱动因素。为了定量评估基因表达中的细胞间变异性及其随时间的演变,我们使用香农熵作为异质性的度量。熵值在分化过程的前8小时显著增加,在8至24小时之间达到峰值,然后降至显著更低的值。此外,我们观察到熵的先前最大值点先于两个至关重要的关键点:在24至48小时之间对分化的不可逆承诺,随后在48小时时细胞大小变异性显著增加。总之,在单细胞水平上进行分析时,分化过程与其经典的群体平均观点看起来非常不同。可以计算新的可观测值(如熵),其行为与以下观点完全一致,即分化不是所有细胞以相同方式执行的“简单”程序,而是由基础分子网络的动态行为导致的。