Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States; Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States; Population Health and Outcomes Research Core, Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States; Population Health and Outcomes Research Core, Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
J Geriatr Oncol. 2017 Mar;8(2):117-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
Most prior studies on aggressive end-of-life care in older patients with cancer have accounted for social determinants of health (e.g., race, income, and education), but rarely for multimoribidity (MM). In this study, we examine the association between end-of-life care and each of the social determinants of health and MM, hypothesizing that higher MM is associated with less aggressive care.
From the linked 1991-2008 Health and Retirement Study, Medicare data, and the National Death Index, we identified fee-for-service patients age ≥66years who died from cancer (n=835). MM was defined as the occurrence or co-occurrence of chronic conditions, functional limitations, and/or geriatric syndromes. Aggressive care was based on claims-derived measures of receipt of cancer-directed treatment in the last two weeks of life; admission to the hospital and/or emergency department (ED) within the last month; and in-hospital death. We also identified patients enrolled in hospice. In multivariable logistic regression models, we analyzed the associations of interest, adjusting for potential confounders.
While 61.2% of the patients enrolled in hospice, 24.6% underwent cancer-directed treatment; 55.1% were admitted to the hospital and/or ED; and 21.7% died in the hospital. We observed a U-shaped distribution between income and in-hospital death. Chronic conditions and geriatric syndromes were associated with some outcomes, but not with others.
To improve quality end-of-life care and curtail costs incurred by dying patients, relevant interventions need to account for social determinants of health and MM in a nuanced fashion.
大多数先前关于老年癌症患者积极临终关怀的研究都考虑了健康的社会决定因素(例如,种族、收入和教育),但很少考虑多重病态(MM)。在这项研究中,我们研究了临终关怀与健康的社会决定因素和 MM 之间的关系,假设更高的 MM 与较少的积极护理相关。
从 1991 年至 2008 年的健康与退休研究、医疗保险数据和国家死亡指数中,我们确定了年龄≥66 岁、死于癌症的按服务收费患者(n=835)。MM 定义为慢性疾病、功能障碍和/或老年综合征的发生或共同发生。积极护理是基于在生命的最后两周内接受癌症定向治疗、在最后一个月内入院和/或急诊就诊以及在医院内死亡的索赔衍生措施来确定的。我们还确定了参加临终关怀的患者。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,我们分析了感兴趣的关联,调整了潜在的混杂因素。
虽然 61.2%的患者参加了临终关怀,但 24.6%接受了癌症定向治疗;55.1%住院和/或急诊就诊;21.7%在医院死亡。我们观察到收入与院内死亡之间存在 U 形分布。慢性疾病和老年综合征与某些结果相关,但与其他结果无关。
为了改善临终关怀质量并减少临终患者的费用,相关干预措施需要以细致入微的方式考虑健康的社会决定因素和 MM。