Rimar Kalen, Khambati Aziz, McGuire Barry B, Rebuck David A, Perry Kent T, Nadler Robert B
Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Adv Urol. 2016;2016:8045210. doi: 10.1155/2016/8045210. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
Robotic partial nephrectomy with peritumoral radiofrequency ablation (RFA-RPN) is a novel clampless technique. We describe oncologic and functional outcomes in a prospective cohort. . From May, 2007, to December, 2009, 49 consecutive patients with renal masses <7 cm underwent RFA-RPN. During this period, only the RFA-RPN technique was utilized for all cases of partial nephrectomy. Pre- and postoperative data were analyzed and compared to 36 consecutive patients who underwent LPN. . In total, 49 tumors were treated in the RFA-RPN group and 36 tumors in the comparison group. Mean operative time was longer in the RFA-RPN group (370 min versus 293 min, < 0.001). There were no significant differences in mean EBL (231 cc versus 250 cc, = 0.42), transfusion rate (8.2% versus 11.1%, = 0.7), or hospital stay (3.9 versus 4.4 days, = 0.2). Two patients in the RFA-RPN (4.1%) and 1 (2.7%) patient in the comparison group had a positive surgical margin ( = 0.75). 17 (34.7%) patients had a postoperative urine leak in the RFA-RPN group versus 2 (5.6%) patients in the comparison group ( = 0.001). Mean follow-up was 54 months versus 68.4 months in the comparison group. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding change in GFR ( = 0.67). There were 3 recurrences (6.1%) in the RFA-RPN group and 0 recurrences in the RPN group ( = 0.23). There were 3 deaths (6.1%) in the RFA-RPN group (one cancer specific) and 4 deaths (11.1%) in the RPN group (non-cancer specific) over the follow-up period ( = 0.44). . Our data suggests that this technique is associated with a similar degree of renal preservation but higher rates of postoperative urine leak and possibly higher rates of recurrence.
机器人辅助肾部分切除术联合瘤周射频消融术(RFA-RPN)是一种新型的无阻断技术。我们在一个前瞻性队列中描述了其肿瘤学和功能学结果。从2007年5月至2009年12月,49例连续的肾肿块<7cm的患者接受了RFA-RPN手术。在此期间,所有肾部分切除术病例均仅采用RFA-RPN技术。对术前和术后数据进行分析,并与36例连续接受腹腔镜肾部分切除术(LPN)的患者进行比较。RFA-RPN组共治疗49个肿瘤,对照组治疗36个肿瘤。RFA-RPN组的平均手术时间更长(370分钟对293分钟,P<0.001)。平均术中出血量(231ml对250ml,P = 0.42)、输血率(8.2%对11.1%,P = 0.7)或住院时间(3.9天对4.4天,P = 0.2)无显著差异。RFA-RPN组有2例患者(4.1%)手术切缘阳性,对照组有1例患者(2.7%)手术切缘阳性(P = 0.75)。RFA-RPN组有17例患者(34.7%)术后发生尿漏,而对照组有2例患者(5.6%)发生尿漏(P = 0.001)。平均随访时间RFA-RPN组为54个月,对照组为68.4个月。两组间肾小球滤过率(GFR)变化无显著差异(P = 0.67)。RFA-RPN组有3例复发(6.1%),RPN组无复发(P = 0.23)。随访期间,RFA-RPN组有3例死亡(6.1%)(1例为癌症相关),RPN组有4例死亡(11.1%)(均为非癌症相关)(P = 0.44)。我们的数据表明,该技术与相似程度的肾脏保留相关,但术后尿漏发生率较高,且可能复发率也较高。