Suppr超能文献

韩国高级别前列腺癌风险计算器的开发与外部验证:在亚洲队列中与两种西方风险计算器的比较。

Development and External Validation of the Korean Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for High-Grade Prostate Cancer: Comparison with Two Western Risk Calculators in an Asian Cohort.

作者信息

Park Jae Young, Yoon Sungroh, Park Man Sik, Choi Hoon, Bae Jae Hyun, Moon Du Geon, Hong Sung Kyu, Lee Sang Eun, Park Chanwang, Byun Seok-Soo

机构信息

Department of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0168917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168917. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We developed the Korean Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for High-Grade Prostate Cancer (KPCRC-HG) that predicts the probability of prostate cancer (PC) of Gleason score 7 or higher at the initial prostate biopsy in a Korean cohort (http://acl.snu.ac.kr/PCRC/RISC/). In addition, KPCRC-HG was validated and compared with internet-based Western risk calculators in a validation cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a logistic regression model, KPCRC-HG was developed based on the data from 602 previously unscreened Korean men who underwent initial prostate biopsies. Using 2,313 cases in a validation cohort, KPCRC-HG was compared with the European Randomized Study of Screening for PC Risk Calculator for high-grade cancer (ERSPCRC-HG) and the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator 2.0 for high-grade cancer (PCPTRC-HG). The predictive accuracy was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration plots.

RESULTS

PC was detected in 172 (28.6%) men, 120 (19.9%) of whom had PC of Gleason score 7 or higher. Independent predictors included prostate-specific antigen levels, digital rectal examination findings, transrectal ultrasound findings, and prostate volume. The AUC of the KPCRC-HG (0.84) was higher than that of the PCPTRC-HG (0.79, p<0.001) but not different from that of the ERSPCRC-HG (0.83) on external validation. Calibration plots also revealed better performance of KPCRC-HG and ERSPCRC-HG than that of PCPTRC-HG on external validation. At a cut-off of 5% for KPCRC-HG, 253 of the 2,313 men (11%) would not have been biopsied, and 14 of the 614 PC cases with Gleason score 7 or higher (2%) would not have been diagnosed.

CONCLUSIONS

KPCRC-HG is the first web-based high-grade prostate cancer prediction model in Korea. It had higher predictive accuracy than PCPTRC-HG in a Korean population and showed similar performance with ERSPCRC-HG in a Korean population. This prediction model could help avoid unnecessary biopsy and reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment in clinical settings.

摘要

目的

我们开发了韩国高级别前列腺癌风险计算器(KPCRC-HG),用于预测韩国队列中初次前列腺活检时 Gleason 评分 7 分及以上的前列腺癌(PC)发生概率(http://acl.snu.ac.kr/PCRC/RISC/)。此外,对 KPCRC-HG 进行了验证,并在一个验证队列中与基于互联网的西方风险计算器进行了比较。

材料与方法

使用逻辑回归模型,基于 602 名先前未接受筛查且接受初次前列腺活检的韩国男性的数据开发了 KPCRC-HG。在一个验证队列中使用 2313 例病例,将 KPCRC-HG 与欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究高级别癌症风险计算器(ERSPCRC-HG)和前列腺癌预防试验高级别癌症风险计算器 2.0(PCPTRC-HG)进行比较。使用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和校准图评估预测准确性。

结果

在 172 名(28.6%)男性中检测到 PC,其中 120 名(19.9%)患有 Gleason 评分 7 分及以上的 PC。独立预测因素包括前列腺特异性抗原水平、直肠指检结果、经直肠超声检查结果和前列腺体积。在外部验证中,KPCRC-HG 的 AUC(0.84)高于 PCPTRC-HG(0.79,p<0.001),但与 ERSPCRC-HG(0.83)无差异。校准图也显示在外部验证中 KPCRC-HG 和 ERSPCRC-HG 的表现优于 PCPTRC-HG。对于 KPCRC-HG,在截断值为 5%时,2313 名男性中的 253 名(11%)本不会接受活检,614 例 Gleason 评分 7 分及以上的 PC 病例中的 14 例(2%)本不会被诊断出来。

结论

KPCRC-HG 是韩国首个基于网络的高级别前列腺癌预测模型。在韩国人群中,它比 PCPTRC-HG 具有更高的预测准确性,并且在韩国人群中与 ERSPCRC-HG 表现相似。这种预测模型有助于避免不必要的活检,并减少临床环境中的过度诊断和过度治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec00/5207506/fef0b6e3447c/pone.0168917.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验