Navas Juan F, Contreras-Rodríguez Oren, Verdejo-Román Juan, Perandrés-Gómez Ana, Albein-Urios Natalia, Verdejo-García Antonio, Perales José C
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Addiction. 2017 Jun;112(6):1086-1094. doi: 10.1111/add.13751. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
Gambling disorder is characterized by poor regulation of negative emotions and impulsive behaviours. This study aimed to (1) compare gambling disorder patients (GDPs) and healthy controls (HCs) in self-report and brain activation measures of emotion regulation; and (2) establish its relationship with negative emotion-driven impulsivity.
Two cross-sectional case-control studies including GDPs and HCs.
GDPs and HCs were recruited from specialized gambling clinics in Andalusia (Spain), where they were following out-patient treatment, and from the community, respectively. Study 1 included 41 GDPs and 45 HCs [All males; M = 35.22, 33.22; standard deviation (SD) = 11.16, 8.18; respectively]. Study 2 included 17 GDPs and 21 HCs (16/20 males; M = 32.94, 31.00; SD = 7.77, 4.60; respectively).
In study 1, we compared both groups on suppression and re-appraisal emotion regulation strategies [Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ)]. In study 2, we compared GDPs with HCs on brain activation associated with down-regulation of negative emotions in a cognitive re-appraisal task, measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In both studies, we correlated the measures of emotion regulation with mood-related impulsivity indicated by negative urgency (UPPS-P impulsive behaviour scale).
GDPs relative to HCs showed higher levels of emotional suppression [F = 4.525; P = 0.036; means difference M -M = -2.433, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -4.706, -0.159] and higher activation of the premotor cortex and middle frontal gyrus during negative emotion regulation in the fMRI task [P ≤ 0.005, cluster size (CS) > 50 voxels]. Negative urgency correlated positively with emotional suppression (r = 0.399, 95% CI = 0.104, 0.629, one-tailed P = 0.005) and middle frontal gyrus activation during negative emotion regulation (P ≤ 0.005, CS > 50) in GDPs.
Gambling disorder is associated with greater use of emotional suppression and stronger pre-motor cortex and middle frontal gyrus activation for regulating negative emotions, compared with healthy controls. Emotional suppression use and middle frontal gyrus activation during negative emotion regulation are linked with negative emotion-driven impulsivity in this disorder.
赌博障碍的特征是负面情绪调节能力差和冲动行为。本研究旨在:(1)比较赌博障碍患者(GDPs)和健康对照者(HCs)在情绪调节的自我报告和大脑激活测量方面的差异;(2)确定其与负面情绪驱动的冲动性之间的关系。
两项横断面病例对照研究,包括GDPs和HCs。
GDPs和HCs分别从安达卢西亚(西班牙)的专门赌博诊所(他们在那里接受门诊治疗)和社区招募。研究1包括41名GDPs和45名HCs[均为男性;平均年龄分别为35.22岁和33.22岁;标准差(SD)分别为11.16和8.18]。研究2包括17名GDPs和21名HCs(16/20为男性;平均年龄分别为32.94岁和31.00岁;SD分别为7.77和4.60)。
在研究1中,我们使用情绪调节问卷(ERQ)比较了两组在抑制和重新评价情绪调节策略方面的差异。在研究2中,我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)测量了在认知重新评价任务中与负面情绪下调相关的大脑激活情况,比较了GDPs和HCs之间的差异。在两项研究中,我们将情绪调节测量与由负面紧迫性(UPPS-P冲动行为量表)表示的与情绪相关的冲动性进行了关联。
与HCs相比,GDPs表现出更高水平的情绪抑制[F = 4.525;P = 0.036;平均差异M - M = -2.433,95%置信区间(CI)= -4.706,-0.159],并且在fMRI任务中负面情绪调节期间运动前皮质和额中回的激活更高[P≤0.005,簇大小(CS)> 50体素]。在GDPs中,负面紧迫性与情绪抑制呈正相关(r = 0.399,95% CI = 0.104,0.629,单尾P = 0.005)以及与负面情绪调节期间额中回的激活呈正相关(P≤0.005,CS> 50)。
与健康对照者相比,赌博障碍与更多地使用情绪抑制以及在调节负面情绪时运动前皮质和额中回更强的激活有关。在这种障碍中,负面情绪调节期间情绪抑制的使用和额中回的激活与负面情绪驱动的冲动性有关。