Suppr超能文献

心脏CT血管造影(CCTA)可预测左心耳封堵器的尺寸及手术结果。

Cardiac CT Angiography (CCTA) predicts left atrial appendage occluder device size and procedure outcome.

作者信息

Goitein Orly, Fink Noam, Hay Ilan, Di Segni Elio, Guetta Victor, Goitein David, Brodov Yafim, Konen Eli, Glikson Michael

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Ramat Gan, Israel.

The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 May;33(5):739-747. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-1050-6. Epub 2017 Jan 9.

Abstract

AIM

To investigate the role of cardiac CT angiography (CCTA) in predicting optimal left atrial appendage (LAA) occluder size and procedure outcome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-six patients underwent pre-procedural CCTA. CCTA and TEE LAA orifice diameters and perimeters were compared with the implanted device size. CCTA 3D configuration was correlated with procedure outcome. Watchman™ device (N = 18): diameters were 21 ± 4, 26 ± 5 and 25 ± 3 mm for TEE, CCTA and inserted device, respectively. Average perimeters were 61 ± 10, 74 ± 8 and 78 ± 11 mm for TEE, CCTA and inserted device, respectively. Better agreement with the device size was found for CCTA compared to TEE (Bland-Altman). ACP™ device (N = 15): diameters were 20 ± 5, 25 ± 4 and 23 ± 4 for TEE, CCTA and inserted device, respectively. Average perimeters were 58 ± 11, 72 ± 15 and 72 ± 13 mm for TEE, CCTA and inserted device, respectively. Excellent correlation and agreement with the device size was found for CCTA compared to TEE. CCTA perimeter >100 mm and "cactus" 3D configuration had a specificity of 96 and 81% respectively for procedure failure.

CONCLUSIONS

CCTA LAA ostial perimeter predicted better the optimal occluder size as compared with the currently used LAA TEE diameter. Moreover, CCTA 3D data may help in predicting potential complications.

摘要

目的

探讨心脏CT血管造影(CCTA)在预测最佳左心耳(LAA)封堵器尺寸及手术结果中的作用。

方法与结果

36例患者在术前接受了CCTA检查。将CCTA和经食管超声心动图(TEE)测量的LAA开口直径及周长与植入装置的尺寸进行比较。CCTA的三维结构与手术结果相关。Watchman™装置(N = 18):TEE、CCTA及植入装置的直径分别为21±4、26±5和25±3mm。TEE、CCTA及植入装置的平均周长分别为61±10、74±8和78±11mm。与TEE相比,CCTA与装置尺寸的一致性更好(Bland-Altman分析)。ACP™装置(N = 15):TEE、CCTA及植入装置的直径分别为20±5、25±4和23±4。TEE、CCTA及植入装置的平均周长分别为58±11、72±15和72±13mm。与TEE相比,CCTA与装置尺寸具有极好的相关性和一致性。CCTA周长>100mm及“仙人掌”三维结构对手术失败的特异性分别为96%和81%。

结论

与目前使用的LAA的TEE直径相比,CCTA测量的LAA开口周长能更好地预测最佳封堵器尺寸。此外,CCTA的三维数据可能有助于预测潜在并发症。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验