Kessel Kerstin A, Hesse Josefine, Straube Christoph, Zimmer Claus, Schmidt-Graf Friederike, Schlegel Jürgen, Meyer Bernhard, Combs Stephanie E
a Department of Radiation Oncology , Technische Universität München (TUM) , Munich , Germany.
b Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS) , Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München , Neuherberg , Germany.
Acta Oncol. 2017 Mar;56(3):422-426. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1276621. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
Re-irradiation (Re-RT) is offered widely in clinical routine, and has been established as a key element in the treatment of recurrent gliomas. At our center, generally re-resection is performed widely by an experienced neurosurgical team. Thus, Re-RT mostly offered to patients with macroscopic residuals or irresectable lesions, is applied later compared to other centers. Therefore, we sought to validate the Combs Prognostic Score developed in 2012 using our independent patient cohort.
We included 199 patients treated from 2002 until April 2016 for recurrent glioma at the Department of Radiation Oncology at the Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich. Different concepts of Re-RT were applied.
Median follow-up after Re-RT was 2.5 months. Median overall survival (OS) after Re-RT was 7.9 months for WHO IV gliomas, 11.3 months for WHO III gliomas, and 13.6 months for low-grade gliomas (WHO I/II). Univariate analyses confirmed the prognostic factors primary histology (p = 0.001), age (p = 0.002), and time between primary radiotherapy and Re-RT (p < 0.001). We also tested Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS), gender, and neurological symptoms before Re-RT as well as planning target volume and found only KPS also significant at p < 0.001. Comparing the prognostic score groups, the outcome was highly statistically significant at p < 0.001.
In our analysis, we validated the Combs Prognostic Score. Validation in this independent large patient cohort confirms the significance of the score for glioma recurrences. Thus, the role of the Combs Prognostic Score might be an essential component of future clinical decision making and patient stratification.
再程放疗(Re-RT)在临床实践中广泛应用,已成为复发性胶质瘤治疗的关键要素。在我们中心,经验丰富的神经外科团队通常会广泛进行再次切除。因此,Re-RT大多应用于有肉眼可见残留或不可切除病灶的患者,与其他中心相比应用时间较晚。因此,我们试图用我们独立的患者队列验证2012年制定的Combs预后评分。
我们纳入了2002年至2016年4月在慕尼黑伊萨尔河右岸医院放射肿瘤学系接受复发性胶质瘤治疗的199例患者。应用了不同的Re-RT概念。
Re-RT后的中位随访时间为2.5个月。WHO IV级胶质瘤Re-RT后的中位总生存期(OS)为7.9个月,WHO III级胶质瘤为11.3个月,低级别胶质瘤(WHO I/II)为13.6个月。单因素分析证实了预后因素包括原发组织学(p = 0.001)、年龄(p = 0.002)以及初次放疗与Re-RT之间的时间间隔(p < 0.001)。我们还测试了Re-RT前的卡氏功能状态评分(KPS)、性别、神经症状以及计划靶体积,发现只有KPS在p < 0.001时也具有显著性。比较预后评分组,结果在p < 0.001时具有高度统计学显著性。
在我们的分析中,我们验证了Combs预后评分。在这个独立的大型患者队列中的验证证实了该评分对胶质瘤复发的重要性。因此,Combs预后评分的作用可能是未来临床决策和患者分层的重要组成部分。