Berry Sandra H, Concannon Thomas W, Morganti Kristy Gonzalez, Auerbach David I, Beckett Megan K, Chen Peggy G, Farley Donna O, Han Bing, Harris Katherine M, Jones Spencer S, Liu Hangsheng, Lovejoy Susan L, Marsh Terry, Martsolf Grant R, Nelson Christopher, Okeke Edward N, Pearson Marjorie L, Pillemer Francesca, Sorbero Melony E, Towe Vivian, Weinick Robin M
Rand Health Q. 2013 Sep 1;3(3):1. eCollection 2013 Fall.
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation within the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has funded 108 Health Care Innovation Awards, funded through the Affordable Care Act, for applicants who proposed compelling new models of service delivery or payment improvements that promise to deliver better health, better health care, and lower costs through improved quality of care for Medicare, Medicaid, and Children's Health Insurance Program enrollees. CMS is also interested in learning how new models would affect subpopulations of beneficiaries (e.g., those eligible for Medicare and Medicaid and complex patients) who have unique characteristics or health care needs that could be related to poor outcomes. In addition, the initiative seeks to identify new models of workforce development and deployment, as well as models that can be rapidly deployed and have the promise of sustainability. This article describes a strategy for evaluating the results. The goal for the evaluation design process is to create standardized approaches for answering key questions that can be customized to similar groups of awardees and that allow for rapid and comparable assessment across awardees. The evaluation plan envisions that data collection and analysis will be carried out on three levels: at the level of the individual awardee, at the level of the awardee grouping, and as a summary evaluation that includes all awardees. Key dimensions for the evaluation framework include implementation effectiveness, program effectiveness, workforce issues, impact on priority populations, and context. The ultimate goal is to identify strategies that can be employed widely to lower cost while improving care.
医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)下属的医疗保险和医疗补助创新中心,已为108个医疗保健创新奖提供了资金,这些资金通过《平价医疗法案》提供给那些提出了引人注目的新服务提供模式或支付改进方案的申请者,这些方案有望通过提高医疗保险、医疗补助和儿童健康保险计划参保人的医疗质量,来实现更好的健康状况、更好的医疗保健服务以及更低的成本。CMS还想了解新模型将如何影响受益人群的亚群体(例如,那些符合医疗保险和医疗补助条件的人群以及复杂患者),这些亚群体具有独特的特征或医疗保健需求,可能与不良结果相关。此外,该倡议旨在确定劳动力发展和部署的新模式,以及能够快速部署并具有可持续性前景的模式。本文描述了一种评估结果的策略。评估设计过程的目标是创建标准化方法,以回答关键问题,这些方法可以针对类似的获奖者群体进行定制,并允许对获奖者进行快速且可比较的评估。评估计划设想将在三个层面进行数据收集和分析:在单个获奖者层面、在获奖者分组层面以及作为包括所有获奖者的汇总评估。评估框架的关键维度包括实施效果、项目效果、劳动力问题、对优先人群的影响以及背景。最终目标是确定能够广泛应用以降低成本同时改善医疗服务的策略。