Fealy Shanna M, Taylor Rachael M, Foureur Maralyn, Attia John, Ebert Lyn, Bisquera Alessandra, Hure Alexis J
School of Nursing & Midwifery University of Newcastle, Port Macquarie Campus, PO Box 210, Port Macquarie, 2444, NSW, Australia.
Faculty of Health & Medicine School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1207-2.
Excessive gestational weight gain is associated with short and long-term adverse maternal and infant health outcomes, independent of pre-pregnancy body mass index. Weighing pregnant women as a stand-alone intervention during antenatal visits is suggested to reduce pregnancy weight gain. In the absence of effective interventions to reduce excessive gestational gain within the real world setting, this study aims to test if routine weighing as a stand-alone intervention can reduce total pregnancy weight gain and, in particular, excessive gestational weight gain.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted between November 2014 and January 2016, and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Seven databases were searched. A priori eligibility criteria were applied to published literature by at least two independent reviewers. Studies considered methodologically rigorous, as per the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Criteria Checklist for Primary Research, were included. Meta-analysis was conducted using fixed-effects models.
A total of 5223 (non-duplicated) records were screened, resulting in two RCTs that were pooled for meta-analysis (n = 1068 randomised participants; n = 538 intervention, n = 534 control). No difference in total weight gain per week was observed between intervention and control groups (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.00 kg/week, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.03 to 0.02). There was also no reduction in excessive gestational weight gain between intervention and control, according to pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI). However, total weight gain was lower in underweight women (n = 23, BMI <18.5 kg/m) in the intervention compared to control group (-0.12 kg/week, 95% CI -0.23 to -0.01). No significant differences were observed for other pregnancy, birth and infant outcomes.
Weighing as a stand-alone intervention is not worse nor better at reducing excessive gestational weight gain than routine antenatal care.
孕期体重过度增加与母婴近期及远期不良健康结局相关,且独立于孕前体重指数。建议在产前检查时对孕妇进行单独称重干预,以减少孕期体重增加。在现实环境中缺乏有效干预措施来减少孕期过度增重的情况下,本研究旨在检验单独称重作为一种干预措施能否减少孕期总体体重增加,尤其是孕期过度增重。
于2014年11月至2016年1月进行了一项随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价和荟萃分析,并按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行报告。检索了七个数据库。至少两名独立审阅者对已发表文献应用了预先设定的纳入标准。根据营养与饮食学会初级研究质量标准清单,纳入方法学严谨的研究。使用固定效应模型进行荟萃分析。
共筛选了5223条(无重复)记录,最终纳入两项RCT进行荟萃分析(n = 1068名随机参与者;n = 538干预组,n = 534对照组)。干预组和对照组之间每周总体重增加无差异(加权平均差(WMD)-0.00 kg/周,95%置信区间(CI)-0.03至0.02)。根据孕前体重指数(BMI),干预组和对照组之间孕期过度增重也没有减少。然而,与对照组相比,干预组中体重过轻的女性(n = 23,BMI < 18.5 kg/m²)总体重增加较低(-0.12 kg/周,95% CI -0.23至-0.01)。在其他妊娠、分娩和婴儿结局方面未观察到显著差异。
单独称重作为一种干预措施,在减少孕期过度增重方面并不比常规产前护理更好或更差。