Suppr超能文献

A Universally Acceptable View on the Adoption of Improved Plant Breeding Techniques.

作者信息

Eriksson Dennis, Ammann Klaus H

机构信息

Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Alnarp, Sweden.

Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jan 5;7:1999. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01999. eCollection 2016.

Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
A Universally Acceptable View on the Adoption of Improved Plant Breeding Techniques.
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jan 5;7:1999. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01999. eCollection 2016.
2
The evolving EU regulatory framework for precision breeding.
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Mar;132(3):569-573. doi: 10.1007/s00122-018-3200-9. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
3
Canadian regulatory aspects of gene editing technologies.
Transgenic Res. 2019 Aug;28(Suppl 2):165-168. doi: 10.1007/s11248-019-00153-2.
4
Precise plant breeding using new genome editing techniques: opportunities, safety and regulation in the EU.
Plant J. 2014 Jun;78(5):742-52. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12413. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
5
CRISPR/Cas Genome Editing and Precision Plant Breeding in Agriculture.
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2019 Apr 29;70:667-697. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100049. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
7
Towards social acceptance of plant breeding by genome editing.
Trends Plant Sci. 2015 Mar;20(3):145-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
8
Canadian regulatory perspectives on genome engineered crops.
GM Crops Food. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):35-43. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1257468. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
9
Regulatory aspects of gene editing in Argentina.
Transgenic Res. 2019 Aug;28(Suppl 2):147-150. doi: 10.1007/s11248-019-00145-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Shotguns vs Lasers: Identifying barriers and facilitators to scaling-up plant molecular farming for high-value health products.
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 20;15(3):e0229952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229952. eCollection 2020.
2
Responsible decision-making for plant research and breeding innovations in the European Union.
GM Crops Food. 2018 Jan 2;9(1):39-44. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2017.1388496.

本文引用的文献

3
A risk-based approach to the regulation of genetically engineered organisms.
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 May 6;34(5):493-503. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3568.
4
Policy: Reboot the debate on genetic engineering.
Nature. 2016 Mar 10;531(7593):165-7. doi: 10.1038/531165a.
5
A proposed regulatory framework for genome-edited crops.
Nat Genet. 2016 Feb;48(2):109-11. doi: 10.1038/ng.3484.
7
The Regulatory Status of Genome-edited Crops.
Plant Biotechnol J. 2016 Feb;14(2):510-8. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12444. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
8
The genome of cultivated sweet potato contains Agrobacterium T-DNAs with expressed genes: An example of a naturally transgenic food crop.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 5;112(18):5844-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419685112. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
9
Mesoporous silica nanoparticle-mediated intracellular cre protein delivery for maize genome editing via loxP site excision.
Plant Physiol. 2014 Feb;164(2):537-47. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.233650. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
10
Transgenic or not? No simple answer! New biotechnology-based plant breeding techniques and the regulatory landscape.
EMBO Rep. 2012 Dec;13(12):1057-61. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.168. Epub 2012 Nov 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验