Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Research Schools CAPHRI and GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Med Ethics. 2017 Oct;43(10):688-691. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103863. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
It has been suggested that future application of stem-cell derived gametes (SCD-gametes) might lead to the possibility for same-sex couples to have genetically related children. Still, for this to become possible, the technique of gamete derivation and techniques of reprogramming somatic cells to a pluripotent state (directly or via somatic cell nuclear transfer) would have to be perfected. Moreover, egg cells would have to be derived from male cells and sperm cells from female cells, which is believed to be particularly difficult, if not impossible. We suggest a more plausible scenario to provide same-sex couples with the possibility to parent a child who is genetically related to both parents. Although technical feasibility is an advantage (also in terms of safety), disadvantages are that cooperation of a donor of the opposite sex is still required and that the partners are genetically linked to the resulting child in a different degree. However, since in our scenario the donor's genetic contribution would not outweigh any of the parents' genetic contribution, this alternative route may ease the fear for a possible parental claim by the donor. Like many other applications in the field of infertility treatment, the goal to create SCD-gametes for reproductive purposes is largely based on the high value attributed to genetic parenthood. Although we believe that genetic relatedness is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for 'good' parenthood, we do believe that many people may consider our scenario a welcome alternative.
有人认为,未来应用干细胞衍生配子(SCD 配子)可能会使同性伴侣有生育具有遗传关系子女的可能性。不过,要想实现这一目标,就必须完善配子衍生技术和将体细胞重编程为多能状态的技术(直接或通过体细胞核移植)。此外,人们认为,从男性细胞中提取卵细胞,从女性细胞中提取精子细胞尤其困难,如果不是不可能的话。我们提出了一个更合理的方案,为同性伴侣提供了一种可能,让他们生育一个与父母双方都有遗传关系的孩子。虽然技术可行性是一个优势(在安全性方面也是如此),但缺点是仍需要异性供体的合作,而且伴侣与所生孩子在遗传上的联系程度不同。然而,由于在我们的方案中,供体的遗传贡献不会超过任何一方父母的遗传贡献,因此这种替代途径可能会减轻供体可能提出的父母权利要求的担忧。与不孕治疗领域的许多其他应用一样,为生殖目的创造 SCD 配子的目标在很大程度上基于对遗传父母身份的高度重视。尽管我们认为遗传相关性既不是“好”父母身份的必要条件,也不是充分条件,但我们确实认为,许多人可能会认为我们的方案是一个受欢迎的选择。