Suppr超能文献

基于绳索训练和器械重量训练之间的肌肉激活与运动学差异。

Differences in Muscle Activation and Kinematics Between Cable-Based and Selectorized Weight Training.

作者信息

Signorile Joseph F, Rendos Nicole K, Heredia Vargas Hector H, Alipio Taislaine C, Regis Rebecca C, Eltoukhy Moataz M, Nargund Renu S, Romero Matthew A

机构信息

1Laboratory of Neuromuscular Research and Active Aging, Department of Kinesiology and Sport Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida; and2Miller School of Medicine, Center on Aging, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Feb;31(2):313-322. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001493.

Abstract

Signorile, JF, Rendos, NK, Heredia Vargas, HH, Alipio, TC, Regis, RC, Eltoukhy, MM, Nargund, RS, and Romero, MA. Differences in muscle activation and kinematics between cable-based and selectorized weight training. J Strength Cond Res 31(2): 313-322, 2017-Cable resistance training machines are showing resurgent popularity and allow greater number of degrees of freedom than typical selectorized equipment. Given that specific kinetic chains are used during distinct activities of daily living (ADL), cable machines may provide more effective interventions for some ADL, whereas others may be best addressed using selectorized equipment. This study examined differences in activity levels (root mean square of the EMG [rmsEMG]) of 6 major muscles (pectoralis major, PM; anterior deltoid, AD; biceps brachii, BB; rectus abdominis, RA; external obliques, EO; and triceps brachii, TB) and kinematics of multiple joints between a cable and standard selectorized machines during the biceps curl, the chest press, and the overhead press performed at 1.5 seconds per contractile stage. Fifteen individuals (9 men, 6 women; mean age ± SD, 24.33 ± 4.88 years) participated. Machine order was randomized. Significant differences favoring cable training were seen for PM and AD during biceps curl; BB, AD, and EO for chest press; and BB and EO during overhead press (p ≤ 0.05). Greater starting and ending angles were seen for the elbow and shoulder joints during selectorized biceps curl, whereas hip and knee starting and ending angles were greater for cable machine during chest and overhead presses (p < 0.0001). Greater range of motion (ROM) favoring the cable machine was also evident (p < 0.0001). These results indicate that utilization patterns of selected muscles, joint angles, and ROMs can be varied because of machine application even when similar exercises are used, and therefore, these machines can be used selectively in training programs requiring specific motor or biomechanical patterns.

摘要

西尼奥里莱,JF;伦多斯,NK;埃雷迪亚·巴尔加斯,HH;阿利皮奥,TC;雷吉斯,RC;埃尔图基,MM;纳贡德,RS;以及罗梅罗,MA。基于绳索训练和器械训练在肌肉激活和运动学方面的差异。《力量与体能研究杂志》31(2): 313 - 322,2017年 - 绳索阻力训练器械正重新受到欢迎,并且比典型的器械设备具有更多的自由度。鉴于在日常生活活动(ADL)的不同活动中会使用特定的运动链,绳索器械可能对某些ADL提供更有效的干预措施,而其他一些ADL可能使用器械设备来处理效果最佳。本研究考察了在二头肌弯举、卧推和 overhead press 动作中,以每个收缩阶段1.5秒的速度进行时,6块主要肌肉(胸大肌,PM;三角肌前束,AD;肱二头肌,BB;腹直肌,RA;腹外斜肌,EO;以及肱三头肌,TB)的活动水平(肌电图的均方根[rmsEMG])差异以及绳索器械和标准器械在多个关节的运动学差异。15名个体(9名男性,6名女性;平均年龄±标准差,24.33±4.88岁)参与了研究。器械顺序是随机的。在二头肌弯举过程中,胸大肌和三角肌前束在绳索训练时表现出显著差异;卧推时肱二头肌、三角肌前束和腹外斜肌有差异; overhead press 时肱二头肌和腹外斜肌有差异(p≤0.05)。在器械二头肌弯举过程中,肘关节和肩关节的起始和结束角度更大,而在卧推和 overhead press 过程中,绳索器械训练时髋关节和膝关节的起始和结束角度更大(p < 0.0001)。有利于绳索器械的更大运动范围(ROM)也很明显(p < 0.0001)。这些结果表明,即使使用相似的练习,由于器械的应用,所选肌肉的使用模式、关节角度和ROMs也会有所不同,因此,这些器械可以在需要特定运动或生物力学模式的训练计划中选择性使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验