Alvarado-Cabrero Isabel, Roma Andres A, Park Kay J, Rutgers Joanne K L, Silva Elvio G
Department of Pathology (I.A.C.), Mexican Oncology Hospital, IMSS, Mexico City, Mexico Department of Pathology (A.A.R.), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio Department of Pathology (K.J.P.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York Department of Pathology (J.K.L.R., E.G.S.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2017 Sep;36(5):476-485. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000357.
A pattern-based classification system has recently been proposed for invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma (EAC), which is predictive of the risk for lymph node metastases (LNM). The main utility of the system lies in separating cases with very low risk for LNM (pattern A) from those with higher risk (pattern B and C). Different growth patterns (GPs) are found in pattern C cases. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of GP on the behavior of pattern C EAC. By reevaluating 189 pattern C EACs, we documented 6 architectural GPs: diffuse destructive (DD), confluent (CON), extensive linear destructive (ELD), band-like lymphocytic infiltrate (BLL), solid (SOL), and micropapillary (MP). When an EAC had an appreciable second component (≤50%) the designation of a mixed EAC was used. We found 32 (17%) tumors to be DD, 23 (12%) CON, 27 (14%) ELD, 9 (5%) SOL, 7 (4%) BLL, and 7 (4%) micropapillary. A total of 84 (44%) EACs were mixed (DD+CON). All micropapillary EACs had LNM versus none of the patients with EAC with an ELD GP (P=0.002). Recurrent disease was seen in 44% of EACs with a DD GP, whereas 0% of EACs with BLL GP developed recurrent disease. Mixed (DD+CON) tumors had a significantly worse 6-year overall survival. This study demonstrated that not all pattern C EACs have an aggressive behavior. These patients should be treated with radical hysterectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy.
最近有人提出了一种基于模式的浸润性宫颈腺癌(EAC)分类系统,该系统可预测淋巴结转移(LNM)风险。该系统的主要作用在于将LNM风险极低的病例(模式A)与风险较高的病例(模式B和C)区分开来。在模式C病例中发现了不同的生长模式(GPs)。本研究的目的是评估GP对模式C EAC行为的影响。通过重新评估189例模式C EAC,我们记录了6种结构生长模式:弥漫性破坏性(DD)、融合性(CON)、广泛线性破坏性(ELD)、带状淋巴细胞浸润(BLL)、实性(SOL)和微乳头状(MP)。当EAC有明显的第二种成分(≤50%)时,使用混合EAC的命名。我们发现32例(17%)肿瘤为DD,23例(12%)为CON,27例(14%)为ELD,9例(5%)为SOL,7例(4%)为BLL,7例(4%)为微乳头状。共有84例(44%)EAC为混合性(DD+CON)。所有微乳头状EAC均有LNM,而ELD生长模式的EAC患者均无LNM(P=0.002)。DD生长模式的EAC中有44%出现复发性疾病,而BLL生长模式的EAC中0%出现复发性疾病。混合性(DD+CON)肿瘤的6年总生存率明显更差。本研究表明,并非所有模式C EAC都具有侵袭性。这些患者应接受根治性子宫切除术和前哨淋巴结活检。