1 Faculty of Medicine of ABC (FMABC), São Paulo, Brazil.
2 Faculty of Juazeiro do Norte (FJN), Juazeiro do Norte, Brazil.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;63(1):21-32. doi: 10.1177/0020764016677557. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
Studies about mental disorders are very rare in the Northeast of Brazil, especially when psychopathologies in children and adolescents are considered. The consequence is a small availability of data and an absence of a real epidemiological profile.
This is a systematic review with meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol, in the period from 2003 to 2015, using the databases LILACS, SciELO and BVS. The analysis comprised the keywords 'models of primary and secondary healthcare in mental health', 'psychiatric reform' and 'policies and services in mental health', using the Boolean operator '# AND'. Original texts based on secondary data from the Hospital Information System of the Brazilian Unified Health System were also included via the Citizen Electronic Record System, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, and Ministry of Health. Grey literature was used by means of hand searching.
A combined analysis of the strategies mentioned in the analyzed articles shows a combined odds ratio of 1.291 (confidence interval (CI) = 1.054-1.582), thus it demonstrates the efficacy of using such strategies in the elaboration of institutional apparatus in mental health. The p-value of the chi-square distribution resulted in .9753, which does not reject the hypothesis of association between strategies in mental health and possible development of institutional apparatus in mental health.
A combined analysis of all strategies mentioned in the analyzed studies shows efficacy of using strategies to elaborate institutional apparatus in mental health.
在巴西北部,关于精神障碍的研究非常罕见,尤其是在考虑儿童和青少年精神病理学时。其结果是可用数据很少,缺乏真实的流行病学特征。
这是一项系统评价,采用荟萃分析,遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)方案,时间范围为 2003 年至 2015 年,使用 LILACS、SciELO 和 BVS 数据库。分析中使用了“精神卫生初级和二级保健模式”、“精神科改革”和“精神卫生政策和服务”的关键词,并使用布尔运算符“# AND”。还通过公民电子记录系统、巴西地理与统计研究所和卫生部,纳入了基于巴西统一卫生系统医院信息系统的二次数据的原始文本。通过手动搜索,利用灰色文献。
对分析文章中提到的策略进行综合分析,得出的合并优势比为 1.291(置信区间[CI]:1.054-1.582),因此证明了在精神卫生机构仪器的制定中使用这些策略的有效性。卡方分布的 p 值为.9753,不拒绝精神卫生策略与精神卫生机构仪器的可能发展之间存在关联的假设。
对分析研究中提到的所有策略进行综合分析表明,使用策略制定精神卫生机构仪器是有效的。