Onland Wes, De Jaegere Anne Pmc, Offringa Martin, van Kaam Anton
Department of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ.
Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5G 1X8.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 31;1(1):CD010941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010941.pub2.
Cochrane systematic reviews show that systemic postnatal corticosteroids reduce the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants. However, corticosteroids have also been associated with an increased risk of neurodevelopmental impairment. It is unknown whether these beneficial and adverse effects are modulated by differences in corticosteroid treatment regimens.
To assess the effects of different corticosteroid treatment regimens on mortality, pulmonary morbidity, and neurodevelopmental outcome in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.
We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review group to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 2) in the Cochrane Library (searched 21 March 2016), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to 21 March 2016), Embase (1980 to 21 March 2016), and CINAHL (1982 to 21 March 2016). We also searched clinical trials' databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomized controlled trials.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two or more different treatment regimens of systemic postnatal corticosteroids in preterm infants at risk for BPD, as defined by the original trialists. Studies investigating one treatment regimen of systemic corticosteroids to a placebo or studies using inhalation corticosteroids were excluded.
Two authors independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials and extracted data on study design, participant characteristics and the relevant outcomes. We asked the original investigators to verify if data extraction was correct and, if possible, to provide any missing data. The primary outcomes to be assessed were: mortality at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (PMA) or at hospital discharge; BPD defined as oxygen dependency at 36 weeks' PMA; long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae, including cerebral palsy, measured by the Bayley Mental Developmental Index (MDI); and blindness or poor vision. Secondary outcomes were: duration of mechanical ventilation and failure to extubate at day 3 and 7 after initiating therapy; rescue treatment with corticosteroids outside the study period; and the incidence of hypertension, sepsis and hyperglycemia during hospitalizations. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). We used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of evidence.
Fourteen studies were included in this review. Only RCTs investigating dexamethasone were identified. Eight studies enrolling a total of 303 participants investigated the cumulative dosage administered; three studies contrasted a high versus a moderate and five studies a moderate versus a low cumulative dexamethasone dose.Analysis of the studies investigating a moderate dexamethasone dose versus a high-dosage regimen showed an increased risk of BPD (typical risk ratio (RR) 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 2.22; typical risk difference (RD) 0.26, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.49; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 4, 95% CI 1.9 to 23.3; I² = 0%, 2 studies, 55 infants) as well as an increased risk of abnormal neurodevelopmental outcome (typical RR 8.33, 95% CI 1.63 to 42.48; RD 0.30, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.46; NNTH 4, 95% CI 2.2 to 7.3; I² = 68%, 2 studies, 74 infants) when using a moderate cumulative-dosage regimen. The composite outcomes of death or BPD and death or abnormal neurodevelopmental outcome showed similar results although the former only reached borderline significance.There were no differences in outcomes between a moderate- and a low-dosage regimen.Four other studies enrolling 762 infants investigated early initiation of dexamethasone therapy versus a moderately early or delayed initiation and showed no significant differences in the primary outcomes. The two RCTs investigating a continuous versus a pulse dexamethasone regimen showed an increased risk of the combined outcome death or BPD when using the pulse therapy. Finally, two trials investigating a standard regimen versus a participant-individualized course of dexamethasone showed no difference in the primary outcome and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes.The quality of evidence for all comparisons discussed above was assessed as low or very low, because the validity of all comparisons is hampered by small samples of randomized infants, heterogeneity in study population and design, non-protocolized use of 'rescue' corticosteroids and lack of long-term neurodevelopmental data in most studies.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that some studies reported a modulating effect of treatment regimens in favor of higher-dosage regimens on the incidence of BPD and neurodevelopmental impairment, recommendations on the optimal type of corticosteroid, the optimal dosage, or the optimal timing of initiation for the prevention of BPD in preterm infants cannot be made based on current level of evidence. A well-designed large RCT is urgently needed to establish the optimal systemic postnatal corticosteroid dosage regimen.
Cochrane系统评价表明,全身性产后使用皮质类固醇可降低早产儿患支气管肺发育不良(BPD)的风险。然而,皮质类固醇也与神经发育障碍风险增加有关。目前尚不清楚这些有益和不良影响是否会因皮质类固醇治疗方案的差异而受到调节。
评估不同皮质类固醇治疗方案对极低出生体重(VLBW)婴儿死亡率、肺部发病率和神经发育结局的影响。
我们采用Cochrane新生儿评价组的标准检索策略,检索Cochrane图书馆中的Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL;2016年第2期)(检索时间为2016年3月21日)、通过PubMed检索的MEDLINE(1966年至2016年3月21日)、Embase(1980年至2016年3月21日)和CINAHL(1982年至2016年3月21日)。我们还检索了临床试验数据库、会议论文集以及检索到的随机对照试验文章的参考文献列表。
随机对照试验(RCT),比较两种或更多不同的全身性产后皮质类固醇治疗方案对有BPD风险的早产儿的疗效,如原始试验者所定义。排除研究一种全身性皮质类固醇治疗方案与安慰剂对照的研究或使用吸入性皮质类固醇的研究。
两位作者独立评估试验的合格性和质量,并提取关于研究设计、参与者特征和相关结局的数据。我们要求原始研究者核实数据提取是否正确,并在可能的情况下提供任何缺失的数据。待评估的主要结局为:孕龄36周(PMA)或出院时的死亡率;定义为孕龄36周时需氧依赖的BPD;长期神经发育后遗症,包括通过贝利智力发育指数(MDI)测量的脑瘫;以及失明或视力不佳。次要结局为:机械通气持续时间以及治疗开始后第3天和第7天不能拔管;研究期间外使用皮质类固醇进行抢救治疗;以及住院期间高血压、败血症和高血糖的发生率。使用Review Manager 5(RevMan 5)对数据进行分析。我们采用GRADE方法评估证据质量。
本评价纳入了14项研究。仅识别出研究地塞米松的RCT。八项研究共纳入303名参与者,研究了累积给药剂量;三项研究对比了高剂量与中剂量,五项研究对比了中剂量与低剂量的累积地塞米松剂量。对研究中剂量地塞米松方案与高剂量方案的分析表明,使用中剂量累积方案时,BPD风险增加(典型风险比(RR)1.50,95%置信区间(CI)1.01至2.22;典型风险差(RD)0.26,95%CI 0.03至0.49;导致额外有害结局的需治疗人数(NNTH)4,95%CI 1.9至23.3;I² = 0%,2项研究,55名婴儿),以及异常神经发育结局风险增加(典型RR 8.33,95%CI 1.63至42.48;RD 0.30,95%CI 0.14至0.46;NNTH 4,95%CI 2.2至7.3;I² = 68%,2项研究,74名婴儿)。死亡或BPD以及死亡或异常神经发育结局的综合结局显示出相似的结果,尽管前者仅达到临界显著性。中剂量方案与低剂量方案在结局方面无差异。其他四项纳入762名婴儿的研究,比较了地塞米松治疗的早期启动与中度早期或延迟启动,在主要结局方面无显著差异。两项研究连续与脉冲地塞米松方案的RCT表明,使用脉冲治疗时,死亡或BPD联合结局的风险增加。最后,两项研究标准方案与个体化地塞米松疗程的试验在主要结局和长期神经发育结局方面无差异。上述所有比较的证据质量被评估为低或极低,因为所有比较的有效性受到随机分组婴儿样本量小、研究人群和设计的异质性、“抢救”皮质类固醇的非方案化使用以及大多数研究缺乏长期神经发育数据的影响。
尽管一些研究报告了治疗方案对BPD发病率和神经发育障碍的调节作用有利于高剂量方案,但基于目前的证据水平,无法就预防早产儿BPD的最佳皮质类固醇类型、最佳剂量或最佳起始时机提出建议。迫切需要设计良好的大型RCT来确定最佳的全身性产后皮质类固醇剂量方案。