Suppr超能文献

对乙酰氨基酚、双氯芬酸治疗全科医疗中急性腰痛的疗效及建议:一项随机对照试验(PACE Plus)的设计

Efficacy of paracetamol, diclofenac and advice for acute low back pain in general practice: design of a randomized controlled trial (PACE Plus).

作者信息

Schreijenberg M, Luijsterburg P A J, Van Trier Y D M, Rizopoulos D, Koopmanschap M A, Voogt L, Maher C G, Koes B W

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, PO box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Feb 1;18(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1432-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low back pain is common and associated with a considerable burden to patients and society. There is uncertainty regarding the relative benefit of paracetamol and diclofenac and regarding the additional effect of pain medication compared with advice only in patients with acute low back pain. This trial will assess the effectiveness of paracetamol, diclofenac and placebo for acute low back pain over a period of 4 weeks. Furthermore, this trial will assess the additional effectiveness of paracetamol, diclofenac and placebo compared with advice only for acute low back pain over a period of 4 weeks.

METHODS

The PACE Plus trial is a multi-center, placebo-blinded, superiority randomized controlled trial in primary care, with a follow-up of 12 weeks. Patients with acute low back pain aged 18-60 years presenting in general practice will be included. Patients are randomized into four groups: 1) Advice only (usual care conforming with the clinical guideline of the Dutch College of General Practitioners); 2) Advice and paracetamol; 3) Advice and diclofenac; 4) Advice and placebo. The primary outcome is low back pain intensity measured with a numerical rating scale (0-10). Secondary outcomes include compliance to treatment, disability, perceived recovery, costs, adverse reactions, satisfaction, sleep quality, co-interventions and adequacy of blinding. Between group differences for low back pain intensity will be evaluated using a repeated measurements analysis with linear effects models. An economic evaluation will be performed using a cost-effectiveness analysis with low back pain intensity and a cost-utility analysis with quality of life. Explorative analyses will be performed to assess effect modification by predefined variables. Ethical approval has been granted. Trial results will be released to an appropriate peer-viewed journal.

DISCUSSION

This paper presents the design of the PACE Plus trial: a multi-center, placebo-blinded, superiority randomized controlled trial in primary care that will assess the effectiveness of advice only, paracetamol, diclofenac and placebo for acute low back pain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Dutch Trial Registration NTR6089 , registered September 14th, 2016.

PROTOCOL

Version 4, June 2016.

摘要

背景

腰痛很常见,给患者和社会带来了相当大的负担。对于扑热息痛和双氯芬酸的相对益处,以及与仅给予建议相比,疼痛药物在急性腰痛患者中的额外效果,目前尚不确定。本试验将评估扑热息痛、双氯芬酸和安慰剂在4周内对急性腰痛的有效性。此外,本试验还将评估扑热息痛、双氯芬酸和安慰剂与仅给予建议相比,在4周内对急性腰痛的额外有效性。

方法

PACE Plus试验是一项在初级保健机构进行的多中心、安慰剂对照、优效性随机对照试验,随访期为12周。纳入年龄在18至60岁、因急性腰痛就诊于全科医疗的患者。患者被随机分为四组:1)仅给予建议(符合荷兰全科医生学院临床指南的常规护理);2)给予建议和扑热息痛;3)给予建议和双氯芬酸;4)给予建议和安慰剂。主要结局是用数字评分量表(0至10)测量的腰痛强度。次要结局包括治疗依从性、残疾情况、感知恢复情况、费用、不良反应、满意度、睡眠质量、联合干预措施以及盲法的充分性。将使用线性效应模型的重复测量分析来评估组间腰痛强度的差异。将进行经济评估,采用以腰痛强度为指标的成本效益分析和以生活质量为指标的成本效用分析。将进行探索性分析,以评估预定义变量的效应修正情况。已获得伦理批准。试验结果将发表在合适的同行评审期刊上。

讨论

本文介绍了PACE Plus试验的设计:一项在初级保健机构进行的多中心、安慰剂对照、优效性随机对照试验,该试验将评估仅给予建议、扑热息痛、双氯芬酸和安慰剂对急性腰痛的有效性。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册编号NTR6089,于2016年9月注册。

方案

2016年6月第4版。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/818c/5286693/47c903e9a2bf/12891_2017_1432_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验