Suppr超能文献

在髂骶骨盆骨肿瘤手术中使用计算机导航对患者来说更安全吗?

Is computer navigation when used in the surgery of iliosacral pelvic bone tumours safer for the patient?

作者信息

Laitinen M K, Parry M C, Albergo J I, Grimer R J, Jeys L M

机构信息

Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, and Tampere University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Unit of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Tampere, Finland.

Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2017 Feb;99-B(2):261-266. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B2.BJJ-2016-0149.R2.

Abstract

AIMS

Due to the complex anatomy of the pelvis, limb-sparing resections of pelvic tumours achieving adequate surgical margins, can often be difficult. The advent of computer navigation has improved the precision of resection of these lesions, though there is little evidence comparing resection with or without the assistance of navigation. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of navigation-assisted surgery for the resection of pelvic bone tumours involving the posterior ilium and sacrum.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using our prospectively updated institutional database, we conducted a retrospective case control study of 21 patients who underwent resection of the posterior ilium and sacrum, for the treatment of a primary sarcoma of bone, between 1987 and 2015. The resection was performed with the assistance of navigation in nine patients and without navigation in 12. We assessed the accuracy of navigation-assisted surgery, as defined by the surgical margin and how this affects the rate of local recurrence, the disease-free survival and the effects on peri-and post-operative morbidity.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 36.4 years (15 to 66). The mean size of the tumour was 10.9 cm. In the navigation-assisted group, the margin was wide in two patients (16.7%), marginal in six (66.7%) and wide-contaminated in one (11.1%) with no intralesional margin. In the non-navigated-assisted group; the margin was wide in two patients (16.7%), marginal in five (41.7%), intralesional in three (25.0%) and wide-contaminated in two (16.7%). Local recurrence occurred in two patients in the navigation-assisted group (22.2%) and six in the non-navigation-assisted group (50.0%). The disease-free survival was significantly better when operated with navigation-assistance (p = 0.048). The blood loss and operating time were less in the navigated-assisted group, as was the risk of a foot drop post-operatively.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of navigation-assisted surgery for the resection of tumours of the posterior ilium and sacrum has increased the safety for the patients and allows for a better oncological outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:261-6.

摘要

目的

由于骨盆解剖结构复杂,实现足够手术切缘的骨盆肿瘤保肢切除术往往具有挑战性。计算机导航技术的出现提高了这些病变切除的精准度,不过几乎没有证据比较有或没有导航辅助下的切除术。我们的目的是评估导航辅助手术切除累及后髂骨和骶骨的骨盆骨肿瘤的疗效。

患者与方法

利用我们前瞻性更新的机构数据库,我们对1987年至2015年间21例行后髂骨和骶骨切除术以治疗原发性骨肉瘤的患者进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究。9例患者在导航辅助下进行切除,12例未使用导航。我们评估了导航辅助手术的准确性,以手术切缘来定义,以及这如何影响局部复发率、无病生存率和对围手术期及术后发病率的影响。

结果

患者的平均年龄为36.4岁(15至66岁)。肿瘤的平均大小为10.9厘米。在导航辅助组中,2例患者(16.7%)切缘为广泛切缘,6例(66.7%)为边缘性切缘,1例(11.1%)为广泛污染切缘且无瘤内切缘。在非导航辅助组中,2例患者(16.7%)切缘为广泛切缘,5例(41.7%)为边缘性切缘,3例(25.0%)为瘤内切缘,2例(16.7%)为广泛污染切缘。导航辅助组有2例患者(22.2%)发生局部复发,非导航辅助组有6例(50.0%)。在导航辅助下手术时无病生存率显著更好(p = 0.048)。导航辅助组的失血量和手术时间较少,术后足下垂的风险也较低。

结论

引入导航辅助手术切除后髂骨和骶骨肿瘤提高了患者的安全性,并能带来更好的肿瘤学结果。引用本文:《骨与关节杂志》2017;99 - B:261 - 6。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验