Suppr超能文献

最大摄氧量V̇o的测量:V̇o不再适用。

Measurement of the maximum oxygen uptake V̇o: V̇o is no longer acceptable.

作者信息

Poole David C, Jones Andrew M

机构信息

Departments of Kinesiology, Anatomy, and Physiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas; and

Sport and Health Sciences, St. Luke's Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017 Apr 1;122(4):997-1002. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01063.2016. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

Abstract

The maximum rate of O uptake (i.e., V̇o), as measured during large muscle mass exercise such as cycling or running, is widely considered to be the gold standard measurement of integrated cardiopulmonary-muscle oxidative function. The development of rapid-response gas analyzers, enabling measurement of breath-by-breath pulmonary gas exchange, has facilitated replacement of the discontinuous progressive maximal exercise test (that produced an unambiguous V̇o-work rate plateau definitive for V̇o) with the rapidly incremented or ramp testing protocol. Although this is more suitable for clinical and experimental investigations and enables measurement of the gas exchange threshold, exercise efficiency, and V̇o kinetics, a V̇o-work rate plateau is not an obligatory outcome. This shortcoming has led to investigators resorting to so-called secondary criteria such as respiratory exchange ratio, maximal heart rate, and/or maximal blood lactate concentration, the acceptable values of which may be selected arbitrarily and result in grossly inaccurate V̇o estimation. Whereas this may not be an overriding concern in young, healthy subjects with experience of performing exercise to volitional exhaustion, exercise test naïve subjects, patient populations, and less motivated subjects may stop exercising before their V̇o is reached. When V̇o is a or the criterion outcome of the investigation, this represents a major experimental design issue. This CORP presents the rationale for incorporation of a second, constant work rate test performed at ~110% of the work rate achieved on the initial ramp test to resolve the classic V̇o-work rate plateau that is the unambiguous validation of V̇o The broad utility of this procedure has been established for children, adults of varying fitness, obese individuals, and patient populations.

摘要

在诸如骑自行车或跑步等大肌肉群运动中所测得的最大摄氧量(即V̇o₂),被广泛认为是心肺 - 肌肉综合氧化功能的金标准测量指标。快速响应气体分析仪的发展,使得逐次呼吸的肺气体交换测量成为可能,这促进了用快速递增或斜坡测试方案取代不连续的渐进性最大运动测试(该测试产生明确的V̇o₂ - 工作率平台,用于确定V̇o₂)。尽管这种方法更适合临床和实验研究,并且能够测量气体交换阈值、运动效率和V̇o₂动力学,但V̇o₂ - 工作率平台并非必然结果。这一缺点导致研究人员诉诸所谓的次要标准,如呼吸交换率、最大心率和/或最大血乳酸浓度,而这些标准的可接受值可能是任意选择的,会导致V̇o₂估计严重不准确。虽然这对于有进行运动至力竭经验的年轻健康受试者可能不是一个首要问题,但缺乏运动测试经验的受试者、患者群体以及积极性较低的受试者可能在达到其V̇o₂之前就停止运动。当V̇o₂是研究的一个或主要标准结果时,这代表了一个主要的实验设计问题。本CORP提出了纳入第二个恒定工作率测试的基本原理,该测试在初始斜坡测试所达到的工作率的约110%下进行,以解决经典的V̇o₂ - 工作率平台问题,这是对V̇o₂的明确验证。该程序的广泛实用性已在儿童、不同健康水平的成年人、肥胖个体和患者群体中得到证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验