Fagan Kathleen M, Hodgson Michael J
Office of Occupational Medicine and Nursing, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 200 Constitution Ave, NW, Room N3457, Washington, DC 20210, USA.
Office of Occupational Medicine and Nursing, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 200 Constitution Ave, NW, Room N3457, Washington, DC 20210, USA.
J Safety Res. 2017 Feb;60:79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
A 2009 Government Accounting Office (GAO) report, along with numerous published studies, documented that many workplace injuries are not recorded on employers' recordkeeping logs required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and consequently are under-reported to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), resulting in a substantial undercount of occupational injuries in the United States.
OSHA conducted a Recordkeeping National Emphasis Program (NEP) from 2009 to 2012 to identify the extent and causes of unrecorded and incorrectly recorded occupational injuries and illnesses.
OSHA found recordkeeping violations in close to half of all facilities inspected. Employee interviews identified workers' fear of reprisal and employer disciplinary programs as the most important causes of under-reporting. Subsequent inspections in the poultry industry identified employer medical management policies that fostered both under-reporting and under-recording of workplace injuries and illnesses.
OSHA corroborated previous research findings and identified onsite medical units as a potential new cause of both under-reporting and under-recording. Research is needed to better characterize and eliminate obstacles to the compilation of accurate occupational injury and illness data.
Occupational health professionals who work with high hazard industries where low injury rates are being recorded may wish to scrutinize recordkeeping practices carefully. This work suggests that, although many high-risk establishments manage recordkeeping with integrity, the lower the reported injury rate, the greater the likelihood of under-recording and under-reporting of work-related injuries and illnesses.
2009年政府问责办公室(GAO)的一份报告以及众多已发表的研究表明,许多工作场所受伤事件未记录在职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)要求雇主保存的记录日志中,因此向劳工统计局(BLS)报告的数量不足,导致美国职业伤害的统计数量大幅偏低。
OSHA在2009年至2012年开展了一项记录保存全国重点计划(NEP),以确定未记录和记录错误的职业伤害及疾病的程度和原因。
OSHA在近一半受检查的设施中发现了记录保存违规行为。对员工的访谈表明,工人对报复的恐惧以及雇主的纪律处分程序是报告不足的最重要原因。随后对家禽行业的检查发现,雇主的医疗管理政策导致工作场所伤害及疾病的报告不足和记录不足。
OSHA证实了先前的研究结果,并确定现场医疗单位是报告不足和记录不足的一个潜在新原因。需要开展研究,以更好地描述和消除准确汇编职业伤害和疾病数据的障碍。
在记录的伤害率较低的高危险行业工作的职业健康专业人员不妨仔细审查记录保存做法。这项工作表明,尽管许多高风险企业诚实地管理记录保存,但报告的伤害率越低,与工作相关的伤害和疾病记录不足和报告不足的可能性就越大。