Suppr超能文献

探诊时的种植体周围出血:相关因素的横断面多层次分析。

Peri-implant bleeding on probing: a cross-sectional multilevel analysis of associated factors.

机构信息

Private practice, Rimini, Italy.

Clinica Merli, Rimini, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Nov;28(11):1401-1405. doi: 10.1111/clr.13001. Epub 2017 Feb 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to evaluate the association between peri-implant bleeding on probing (BoP) and probing depth. Other factors regarding patients, implants, and sites were taken into consideration.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Consecutive adult patients with ≥1 dental implant were eligible. Two calibrated operators examined the patients. BoP was the outcome variable. The effects of patient, implant and site factors on BoP were assessed using a 3-level logistic model.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients for a total of 92 implants and 552 sites were included in the analysis. The BoP was observed in 217 sites (39%). The odds ratio increased by 1.81 (95% CI from 1.47 to 2.23; P < 0.0001) for each 1 mm increment in probing pocket depth. A significant higher risk was observed also for interproximal vs. approximal surfaces (OR = 1.55; 95% CI from 1.02 to 2.36; P = 0.0402).

CONCLUSIONS

Peri-implant bleeding was associated with site-specific factors.

摘要

目的

评估探诊时的种植体周围出血(BoP)与探诊深度之间的关系。同时考虑了与患者、种植体和部位相关的其他因素。

材料与方法

连续纳入≥1 颗种植体的成年患者。由 2 名经过校准的操作人员对患者进行检查。探诊时出血情况为观察结果。使用 3 水平逻辑回归模型评估患者、种植体和部位因素对 BoP 的影响。

结果

共有 52 名患者(共 92 颗种植体和 552 个部位)纳入分析。217 个部位(39%)出现探诊时出血。探诊深度每增加 1mm,比值比增加 1.81(95%CI:1.47-2.23;P<0.0001)。与近中面相比,颊舌面的出血风险也显著增加(OR=1.55;95%CI:1.02-2.36;P=0.0402)。

结论

种植体周围出血与部位相关的特定因素有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验