Ewen Margaret, Zweekhorst Marjolein, Regeer Barbara, Laing Richard
Health Action International, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Athena Institute, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 7;12(2):e0171284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171284. eCollection 2017.
WHO has set a voluntary target of 80% availability of affordable essential medicines, including generics, to treat major non-communicable diseases (NCDs), in the public and private sectors of countries by 2025. We undertook a secondary analysis of data from 30 surveys in low- and middle-income countries, conducted from 2008-2015 using the World Health Organization (WHO)/Health Action International (HAI) medicine availability and price survey methodology, to establish a baseline for this target.
Data for 49 medicines (lowest priced generics and originator brands) to treat cardiovascular diseases (CVD), diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) and central nervous system (CNS) conditions were analysed to determine their availability in healthcare facilities and pharmacies, their affordability for those on low incomes (based on median patient prices of each medicine), and the percentage of medicines that were both available and affordable. Affordability was expressed as the number of days' wages of the lowest-paid unskilled government worker needed to purchase 30 days' supply using standard treatment regimens. Paying more than 1 days' wages was considered unaffordable.
In low-income countries, 15.2% and 18.9% of lowest-priced generics met WHO's target in the public and private sectors, respectively, and 2.6% and 5.2% of originator brands. In lower-middle income countries, 23.8% and 23.2% of lowest priced generics, and 0.8% and 1.4% of originator brands, met the target in the public and private sectors, respectively. In upper-middle income countries, the situation was better for generics but still suboptimal as 36.0% and 39.4% met the target in public and private sectors, respectively. For originator brands in upper-middle income countries, none reached the target in the public sector and 13.7% in the private sector. Across the therapeutic groups for lowest priced generics, CVD medicines in low-income countries (11.9%), and CNS medicines in lower-middle (10.2%) and upper-middle income countries (33.3%), were least available and affordable in the public sector. In the private sector for lowest priced generics, CNS medicines were least available and affordable in all three country income groups (11.4%, 5.8% and 29.3% in low-, lower-middle and upper-middle income countries respectively).
This data, which can act as a baseline for the WHO target, shows low availability and/or poor affordability is resulting in few essential NCD medicines meeting the target in low- and middle-income countries. In the era of Sustainable Development Goals, and as countries work to achieve Universal Health Coverage, increased commitments are needed by governments to improve the situation through the development of evidence-informed, nationally-contextualised interventions, with regular monitoring of NCD medicine availability, patient prices and affordability.
世界卫生组织设定了一个自愿目标,到2025年,在各国的公共和私营部门中,包括仿制药在内的可负担基本药物用于治疗主要非传染性疾病的可得性达到80%。我们对2008年至2015年期间在低收入和中等收入国家进行的30项调查数据进行了二次分析,采用世界卫生组织(WHO)/国际卫生行动组织(HAI)的药品可得性和价格调查方法,为该目标建立一个基线。
分析了用于治疗心血管疾病(CVD)、糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和中枢神经系统(CNS)疾病的49种药物(价格最低的仿制药和原研品牌药)的数据,以确定它们在医疗机构和药店的可得性、对低收入者的可负担性(基于每种药物的患者中位数价格)以及既可得又可负担的药物百分比。可负担性表示为使用标准治疗方案购买30天供应量所需的最低薪非技术政府工作人员的日工资数。支付超过1天工资被认为是负担不起的。
在低收入国家,价格最低的仿制药在公共和私营部门分别有15.2%和18.9%达到世卫组织目标,原研品牌药分别为2.6%和5.2%。在中低收入国家,价格最低的仿制药在公共和私营部门分别有23.8%和23.2%达到目标,原研品牌药分别为0.8%和1.4%。在中高收入国家,仿制药的情况较好,但仍未达到最佳状态,公共和私营部门分别有36.0%和39.4%达到目标。对于中高收入国家的原研品牌药,公共部门没有达到目标,私营部门为达到13.7%。在价格最低的仿制药的各个治疗组中,低收入国家的心血管疾病药物(11.9%)以及中低收入(10.2%)和中高收入国家(33.3%)的中枢神经系统药物在公共部门的可得性和可负担性最低。在私营部门中,价格最低的仿制药方面,中枢神经系统药物在所有三个国家收入组中的可得性和可负担性最低(低收入、中低收入和中高收入国家分别为11.4%、5.8%和29.3%)。
这些可作为世卫组织目标基线的数据表明,在低收入和中等收入国家,可得性低和/或可负担性差导致很少有基本非传染性疾病药物达到目标。在可持续发展目标时代,随着各国努力实现全民健康覆盖,各国政府需要加大承诺力度,通过制定基于证据、符合国情的干预措施,并定期监测非传染性疾病药物可得性、患者价格和可负担性来改善这种情况。