Andrews Emily Stella
Independent Scholar, London, UK.
Sociol Health Illn. 2017 Feb;39(2):244-257. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12452.
This article explains how old, poor people living with dementia came to be institutionalised in 19th-century Britain (with a focus on London), and how they were responded to by the people who ran those institutions. The institutions in question are lunatic asylums, workhouses and charitable homes. Old people with dementia were admitted to lunatic asylums, workhouses and charitable homes, but were not welcome there. Using the records of Hanwell lunatic asylum, published texts of psychiatric theory, and the administrative records that all of these institutions generated at local and national levels, this article argues that 'the senile' were a perpetual classificatory residuum in the bureaucracy of 19th-century health and welfare. They were too weak and unresponsive to adhere to the norms of the asylum regime, yet too challenging in their behaviour to conform to that of the workhouse, or the charitable home. Across all of these institutions, old people with dementia were represented as an intractable burden, many decades before the 'ageing society' became a demographic reality.
本文解释了19世纪英国(以伦敦为重点)患有痴呆症的老年贫困人口是如何被送进收容机构的,以及经营这些机构的人是如何对待他们的。这里所说的机构是疯人院、济贫院和慈善之家。患有痴呆症的老年人被收容进疯人院、济贫院和慈善之家,但在那里并不受欢迎。本文利用汉韦尔疯人院的记录、已发表的精神病学理论文本,以及所有这些机构在地方和国家层面产生的行政记录,认为“老年人”在19世纪健康与福利的官僚体系中是一个永久性的分类残余群体。他们过于虚弱且反应迟钝,无法遵守收容机构的规定,但行为又极具挑战性,不符合济贫院或慈善之家的规范。在所有这些机构中,早在“老龄化社会”成为人口现实的几十年前,患有痴呆症的老年人就被视为难以解决的负担。