Wilson David R, Mattlage Anna E, Seier Nicole M, Todd Jonathan D, Price Brian G, Kwapiszeski Sarah J, Vardey Rakesh, Billinger Sandra A
University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 16;12(2):e0172294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172294. eCollection 2017.
The purpose of the present study was to determine the reliability of the exercise response (predicted peak VO2) using the total body recumbent stepper (TBRS) submaximal exercise test in: 1) healthy adults 20-70 years of age and 2) adults participating in inpatient stroke rehabilitation. We hypothesized that the predicted peak VO2 (Visit 1) would have an excellent relationship (r > 0.80) to predicted peak VO2 (Visit 2). We also wanted to test whether the exercise response at Visit 1 and Visit 2 would be significantly different.
Healthy adults were recruited from the Kansas City metro area. Stroke participants were recruited during their inpatient rehabilitation stay. Eligible participants completed 2 TBRS submaximal exercise tests between 24 hours and 5 days at similar times of day.
A total of 70 participants completed the study. Healthy adults (n = 50) were 36 M, 38.1 ± 10.1 years and stroke participants (n = 20) were 15 M, 62.5 ± 11.8 years of age. The exercise response was reliable for healthy adults (r = 0.980, p<0.01) and stroke participants (r = 0.987, p<0.01) between Visit 1 and Visit 2. Repeated Measures ANOVA showed a significant difference in predicted values between the two visits for healthy adults (47.2 ± 8.4 vs 47.7 ± 8.5 mL∙kg-1∙min-1; p = 0.04) but not for stroke participants (25.0 ± 9.9 vs 25.3 ± 11.4 mL∙kg-1∙min-1; p = 0.65).
These results suggest that the exercise response is reliable using the TBRS submaximal exercise test in this cohort of healthy adults and stroke participants.
本研究的目的是确定使用全身卧式踏步机(TBRS)进行次极量运动试验时运动反应(预测的峰值摄氧量)在以下人群中的可靠性:1)20至70岁的健康成年人;2)参与住院中风康复的成年人。我们假设预测的峰值摄氧量(第1次就诊)与预测的峰值摄氧量(第2次就诊)之间具有良好的相关性(r>0.80)。我们还想测试第1次就诊和第2次就诊时的运动反应是否存在显著差异。
从堪萨斯城都会区招募健康成年人。中风参与者在住院康复期间被招募。符合条件的参与者在一天中相似的时间,在24小时至5天内完成2次TBRS次极量运动试验。
共有70名参与者完成了研究。健康成年人(n = 50)中男性36名,年龄38.1±10.1岁;中风参与者(n = 20)中男性15名,年龄62.5±11.8岁。第1次就诊和第2次就诊之间,健康成年人(r = 0.980,p<0.01)和中风参与者(r = 0.987,p<0.01)的运动反应具有可靠性。重复测量方差分析显示,健康成年人两次就诊之间的预测值存在显著差异(47.2±8.4 vs 47.7±8.5 mL∙kg-1∙min-1;p = 0.04),但中风参与者不存在显著差异(25.0±9.9 vs 25.3±11.4 mL∙kg-1∙min-1;p = 0.65)。
这些结果表明,在这组健康成年人和中风参与者中,使用TBRS次极量运动试验时运动反应具有可靠性。