Suppr超能文献

针对足部不适患者的韩文版足部功能指数的信效度研究。

The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the foot function index for patients with foot complaints.

作者信息

In Tae-Sung, Jung Jin-Hwa, Kim Keunjo, Jung Kyoung-Sim, Cho Hwi-Young

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Gimcheon University, Republic of Korea.

Department of Occupational Therapy, Semyung University, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jan;29(1):53-56. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.53. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability and validity of the Foot Function Index translated into Korean for use in patients with plantar fasciitis and foot/ankle fracture. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty-six subjects with foot complaints, 14 males and 22 females, participated in the study. Reliability was determined by using the intra-class correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency. Validity was examined by correlating Foot Function Index scores with the Short Form-36 and the Visual Analog Scale scores. [Results] Test-retest reliability was 0.90 for the pain subscale, and 0.94 and 0.91 for the disability and activity limitation subscales, respectively. The criterion-related validity was established by comparison with the Korean version of the Short Form-36 and Visual Analog Scale. [Conclusion] The Korean version of the Foot Function Index was shown to be a reliable and valid instrument for assessing foot complaints.

摘要

[目的] 本研究旨在建立翻译成韩语的足部功能指数在足底筋膜炎和足/踝关节骨折患者中应用的信度和效度。[对象与方法] 36名有足部问题的受试者参与了本研究,其中男性14名,女性22名。通过组内相关系数和用于内部一致性的Cronbach's α系数来确定信度。通过将足部功能指数得分与简明健康状况调查简表(Short Form-36)和视觉模拟量表得分进行相关性分析来检验效度。[结果] 疼痛分量表的重测信度为0.90,残疾和活动受限分量表的重测信度分别为0.94和0.91。通过与韩语版简明健康状况调查简表和视觉模拟量表进行比较,建立了与标准相关的效度。[结论] 韩语版足部功能指数被证明是评估足部问题的可靠且有效的工具。

相似文献

1
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the foot function index for patients with foot complaints.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jan;29(1):53-56. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.53. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
2
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Upper Limb Functional Index.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jun;29(6):1062-1065. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1062. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
3
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Foot Function Index.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Jul-Aug;55(4):759-61. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
4
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the spine functional index.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jun;29(6):1082-1084. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1082. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
5
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the lower limb functional index.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2018 Jan;30(1):50-52. doi: 10.1589/jpts.30.50. Epub 2018 Jan 27.
6
Reliability and validity of the Taiwan Chinese version of the Foot Function Index.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2008 Feb;107(2):111-8. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60124-2.
7
Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Korean version of American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle questionnaire.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Jan-Feb;54(1):46-50. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.08.011. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
8
The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jul;29(7):1250-1253. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1250. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
10
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Foot and Ankle Disability Index.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2024 Jan-Feb;63(1):33-35. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2023.08.007. Epub 2023 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Translation and validation of the Danish Foot Function Index (FFI-DK).
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Aug;25(4):e408-13. doi: 10.1111/sms.12331. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
3
4
A review of the foot function index and the foot function index - revised.
J Foot Ankle Res. 2013 Feb 1;6(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-6-5.
5
High prevalence of foot problems in the Danish population: a survey of causes and associations.
Foot (Edinb). 2010 Mar;20(1):7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
6
Which are the most frequently used outcome instruments in studies on total ankle arthroplasty?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Mar;468(3):815-26. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1036-y. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
7
Understanding the nature and mechanism of foot pain.
J Foot Ankle Res. 2009 Jan 14;2:1. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-2-1.
10
Reliability and validity of the Taiwan Chinese version of the Foot Function Index.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2008 Feb;107(2):111-8. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60124-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验