Soleimanpour Maryam, Rahmani Farzad, Ala Alireza, Morteza Bagi Hamid Reza, Mahmoodpoor Ata, Golzari Samad Ej, Zahmatyar Fatemeh, Mehdizadeh Esfanjani Robab, Soleimanpour Hassan
Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Emergency Medicine Research Team, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2016;8(4):147-151. doi: 10.15171/jcvtr.2016.30. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
Bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation is the first and important part of the airway management. The aim of present study was to evaluate the quality of four different BVM ventilation techniques - E-C, Thenar Eminence, Thenar Eminence (Dominant hand)-E-C (Non dominant hand), and Thenar Eminence (Non dominant hand)-E-C (Dominant hand) - among two novice and experienced groups. In a case-control and mannequin based study that was conducted in Tabriz University of medical sciences, 120 volunteers were recruited and divided into two groups. 60 participants in experienced and other 60 as novice group who observed BVM ventilation but hadn't practical experience about BVM ventilation. Every participant in both groups performed 4 BVM ventilation techniques under the supervision of an experienced assessor. Quality of mannequin chest expansion was recorded by two other experienced assessors who were blind to ventilation process. The data were analyzed with SPSS 17.0. In novice group, when evaluating each technique performance, they did Thenar Eminence (non-dominant hand) - E-C (dominant hand) technique much better than the others (<0.0001). But in the experienced group, there was no meaningful difference between the all four techniques (= 0.102). Novice participants did Thenar Eminence (non-dominant hand) - E-C (dominant hand) technique better than the others. Therefore, it is recommended that training of this technique was placed in educational program of medical students.
袋-阀-面罩(BVM)通气是气道管理的首要且重要部分。本研究旨在评估两种新手组和经验丰富组中四种不同BVM通气技术——E-C手法、鱼际肌手法、鱼际肌手法(优势手)-E-C手法(非优势手)以及鱼际肌手法(非优势手)-E-C手法(优势手)——的通气质量。在大不里士医科大学进行的一项基于病例对照和人体模型的研究中,招募了120名志愿者并将其分为两组。60名参与者为经验丰富组,另外60名作为新手组,新手组观察过BVM通气但没有BVM通气的实践经验。两组中的每位参与者在一名经验丰富的评估者监督下进行4种BVM通气技术操作。由另外两名对通气过程不知情的经验丰富的评估者记录人体模型胸部扩张的质量。数据用SPSS 17.0进行分析。在新手组中,评估每种技术操作时,他们采用鱼际肌手法(非优势手)-E-C手法(优势手)的操作比其他操作要好得多(<0.0001)。但在经验丰富组中,所有四种技术之间没有显著差异(=0.102)。新手参与者采用鱼际肌手法(非优势手)-E-C手法(优势手)的操作比其他操作更好。因此,建议将该技术的培训纳入医学生的教育课程中。