Departments of Allergy and Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, San Diego and Pasadena, Calif.
Departments of Allergy and Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, San Diego and Pasadena, Calif.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Jul-Aug;5(4):1050-1060.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.12.023. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
Chronic oral corticosteroid (C-OCS) use in asthma is an indicator of disease severity, but its risk factors are largely unknown.
To describe patient characteristics and disease burden associated with C-OCS use by adults with persistent asthma.
We identified 9546 patients aged 18 to 64 years in a large managed care organization who met the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set 2-year criteria (2009-2010) for persistent asthma. A subgroup had blood eosinophil counts. We calculated cumulative OCS dispensed per patient in 2010 and examined the distribution of disease characteristics by average daily amounts of OCS dispensed. C-OCS use was defined as 2.5 mg/d or more. Baseline factors (2010) associated with C-OCS use during follow-up (2011) were investigated by multivariable Poisson regression.
At baseline, 782 (8.2%) patients were C-OCS users. Compared with patients who received no or less than 2.5 mg/d OCS, C-OCS users were older and more often female and ethnic minorities; and had more comorbidities, asthma specialist care, greater step-care level, controllers, asthma exacerbations, and greater blood eosinophil counts (all P < .01). Baseline factors significantly associated with C-OCS use in the follow-up year included (1) demographic characteristics: older age, females, blacks versus whites, and whites versus others/unknown ethnicities; (2) disease burden: more asthma emergency department or hospitalization visits, greater step-care level, excessive short-acting β-agonist dispensed, theophylline use, asthma specialist care, and nasal polyposis; (3) greater blood eosinophil counts; and (4) most strongly, C-OCS use.
C-OCS use was associated with more asthma burden, comorbidities, and greater blood eosinophil counts. Prior C-OCS use was the strongest predictor of future C-OCS use.
慢性口服皮质类固醇(C-OCS)在哮喘中的使用是疾病严重程度的一个指标,但它的危险因素在很大程度上尚不清楚。
描述持续性哮喘成人患者使用 C-OCS 的患者特征和疾病负担。
我们在一个大型管理式医疗组织中确定了 9546 名年龄在 18 至 64 岁之间的患者,他们符合医疗保健效果数据和信息集(Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set,HEDIS)2 年持续性哮喘标准(2009-2010 年)。亚组患者进行了血嗜酸性粒细胞计数。我们计算了 2010 年每位患者的累积皮质类固醇用量,并通过平均每日皮质类固醇用量来检查疾病特征的分布。C-OCS 使用定义为 2.5mg/d 或以上。通过多变量泊松回归分析了 2011 年随访期间(2011 年)与 C-OCS 使用相关的基线因素(2010 年)。
在基线时,782 名(8.2%)患者为 C-OCS 使用者。与未使用或使用少于 2.5mg/d 皮质类固醇的患者相比,C-OCS 使用者年龄较大,更常为女性和少数民族;并且合并症更多,接受哮喘专家治疗,更高的阶梯治疗水平,使用更多的控制药物,哮喘加重次数更多,血嗜酸性粒细胞计数更高(均 P <.01)。与随访年内 C-OCS 使用相关的基线因素包括:(1)人口统计学特征:年龄较大、女性、黑人与白人、白人与其他/未知种族;(2)疾病负担:更多的哮喘急诊或住院就诊、更高的阶梯治疗水平、过量的短效β-激动剂处方、茶碱使用、哮喘专家治疗和鼻息肉;(3)更高的血嗜酸性粒细胞计数;(4)最主要的是,C-OCS 使用。
C-OCS 使用与更大的哮喘负担、合并症和更高的血嗜酸性粒细胞计数有关。先前使用 C-OCS 是未来使用 C-OCS 的最强预测因素。