Dhutia Niti M, Zolgharni Massoud, Mielewczik Michael, Negoita Madalina, Sacchi Stefania, Manoharan Karikaran, Francis Darrel P, Cole Graham D
National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Aug;33(8):1135-1148. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1092-4. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
Current guidelines for measuring cardiac function by tissue Doppler recommend using multiple beats, but this has a time cost for human operators. We present an open-source, vendor-independent, drag-and-drop software capable of automating the measurement process. A database of ~8000 tissue Doppler beats (48 patients) from the septal and lateral annuli were analyzed by three expert echocardiographers. We developed an intensity- and gradient-based automated algorithm to measure tissue Doppler velocities. We tested its performance against manual measurements from the expert human operators. Our algorithm showed strong agreement with expert human operators. Performance was indistinguishable from a human operator: for algorithm, mean difference and SDD from the mean of human operators' estimates 0.48 ± 1.12 cm/s (R = 0.82); for the humans individually this was 0.43 ± 1.11 cm/s (R = 0.84), -0.88 ± 1.12 cm/s (R = 0.84) and 0.41 ± 1.30 cm/s (R = 0.78). Agreement between operators and the automated algorithm was preserved when measuring at either the edge or middle of the trace. The algorithm was 10-fold quicker than manual measurements (p < 0.001). This open-source, vendor-independent, drag-and-drop software can make peak velocity measurements from pulsed wave tissue Doppler traces as accurately as human experts. This automation permits rapid, bias-resistant multi-beat analysis from spectral tissue Doppler images.
当前通过组织多普勒测量心脏功能的指南建议使用多个心动周期,但这对人工操作者来说耗时较长。我们展示了一款开源、独立于供应商的拖放式软件,它能够自动执行测量过程。三位专业超声心动图医生分析了来自室间隔和外侧瓣环的约8000个组织多普勒心动周期(48名患者)的数据库。我们开发了一种基于强度和梯度的自动算法来测量组织多普勒速度。我们将其性能与专业人工操作者的手动测量结果进行了对比测试。我们的算法与专业人工操作者的结果高度一致。其性能与人工操作者难以区分:对于算法,与人工操作者估计均值的平均差异和标准差为0.48±1.12 cm/s(R = 0.82);对于个体人工操作者,分别为0.43±1.11 cm/s(R = 0.84)、-0.88±1.12 cm/s(R = 0.84)和0.41±1.30 cm/s(R = 0.78)。在测量轨迹的边缘或中间时,操作者与自动算法之间的一致性得以保持。该算法比手动测量快10倍(p < 0.001)。这款开源、独立于供应商的拖放式软件能够像专业人员一样准确地从脉冲波组织多普勒轨迹中进行峰值速度测量。这种自动化允许从频谱组织多普勒图像进行快速、抗偏差的多心动周期分析。