Albert Martin, Corsilli Daniel, Williamson David R, Brosseau Marc, Bellemare Patrick, Delisle Stéphane, Nguyen Anne Qn, Varin France
Martin Albert, Departments of Intensive Care and Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur, de Montréal Research Center, Université de Montréal, Montréal H4J 1C5, Canada.
World J Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb 4;6(1):74-78. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v6.i1.74.
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of inhaled milrinone in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Open-label prospective cross-over pilot study where fifteen adult patients with hypoxemic failure meeting standard ARDS criteria and monitored with a pulmonary artery catheter were recruited in an academic 24-bed medico-surgical intensive care unit. Random sequential administration of iNO (20 ppm) or nebulized epoprostenol (10 μg/mL) was done in all patients. Thereafter, inhaled milrinone (1 mg/mL) alone followed by inhaled milrinone in association with inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) was administered. A jet nebulization device synchronized with the mechanical ventilation was use to administrate the epoprostenol and the milrinone. Hemodynamic measurements and partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO) were recorded before and after each inhaled therapy administration.
The majority of ARDS were of pulmonary cause ( = 13) and pneumonia ( = 7) was the leading underlying initial disease. Other pulmonary causes of ARDS were: Post cardiopulmonary bypass ( = 2), smoke inhalation injury ( = 1), thoracic trauma and pulmonary contusions ( = 2) and aspiration ( = 1). Two patients had an extra pulmonary cause of ARDS: A polytrauma patient and an intra-abdominal abscess Inhaled nitric oxide, epoprostenol, inhaled milrinone and the combination of inhaled milrinone and iNO had no impact on systemic hemodynamics. No significant adverse events related to study medications were observed. The median increase of PaO from baseline was 8.8 mmHg [interquartile range (IQR) = 16.3], 6.0 mmHg (IQR = 18.4), 6 mmHg (IQR = 15.8) and 9.2 mmHg (IQR = 20.2) respectively with iNO, epoprostenol, inhaled milrinone, and iNO added to milrinone. Only iNO and the combination of inhaled milrinone and iNO had a statistically significant effect on PaO.
When comparing the effects of inhaled NO, milrinone and epoprostenol, only NO significantly improved oxygenation. Inhaled milrinone appeared safe but failed to improve oxygenation in ARDS.
评估吸入米力农治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的安全性和有效性。
在一家拥有24张床位的学术性内科-外科重症监护病房进行开放标签前瞻性交叉试点研究,招募了15名符合标准ARDS标准且通过肺动脉导管进行监测的低氧血症性呼吸衰竭成年患者。所有患者均随机序贯给予吸入一氧化氮(iNO,20 ppm)或雾化依前列醇(10 μg/mL)。此后,单独给予吸入米力农(1 mg/mL),随后给予吸入米力农联合吸入一氧化氮(iNO)。使用与机械通气同步的喷射雾化装置给予依前列醇和米力农。在每次吸入治疗给药前后记录血流动力学测量值和动脉血氧分压(PaO)。
大多数ARDS由肺部原因引起(n = 13),肺炎(n = 7)是主要的潜在初始疾病。ARDS的其他肺部原因包括:体外循环后(n = 2)、烟雾吸入损伤(n = 1)、胸部创伤和肺挫伤(n = 2)以及误吸(n = 1)。两名患者的ARDS有肺外原因:一名多发伤患者和一名腹腔内脓肿患者。吸入一氧化氮、依前列醇、吸入米力农以及吸入米力农与iNO的组合对全身血流动力学均无影响。未观察到与研究药物相关的显著不良事件。与基线相比,iNO、依前列醇、吸入米力农以及米力农加iNO使PaO的中位数增加分别为8.8 mmHg [四分位间距(IQR)= 16.3]、6.0 mmHg(IQR = 18.4)、6 mmHg(IQR = 15.8)和9.2 mmHg(IQR = 20.2)。只有iNO以及吸入米力农与iNO的组合对PaO有统计学显著影响。
在比较吸入一氧化氮、米力农和依前列醇的效果时,只有一氧化氮能显著改善氧合。吸入米力农似乎安全,但未能改善ARDS患者的氧合。