Suppr超能文献

《失乐园》;牙科行业的声誉与监管范围

Paradise Lost; the reputation of the dental profession and regulatory scope.

作者信息

Holden A C L

机构信息

University of Sydney, Lecturer in Dental Ethics, Law and Professionalism, 2 Chalmers Street, Surrey Hills, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia.

出版信息

Br Dent J. 2017 Feb 24;222(4):239-241. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.163.

Abstract

In their recent article in this Journal, Affleck and Macnish (BDJ 2016) state that when questionable, private behaviour of dental professionals does not directly affect patient care or safety, the General Dental Council should have no interest in disciplinary action. They argue that the private affairs of dental professionals have no bearing upon their professional practice. This article is a response to this conclusion in which I examine the relationship between professional and private matters within the context of social media. I also demonstrate that regulatory action in response to behaviour which damages the reputation of the dental profession is more than just appropriate, but also essential in order to preserve the profession's relationship with society. While valid to a point, I find that Affleck and Macnish's view on this issue is too narrow and to fully appreciate the ethical quandaries within this issue, we must adopt a more holistic perspective of the nature of professionalism.

摘要

在他们最近发表于本刊的文章中,阿弗莱克和麦克尼什(《英国牙科杂志》,2016年)指出,当牙科专业人员有问题的私人行为不会直接影响患者护理或安全时,英国牙科总会不应关注采取纪律处分。他们认为,牙科专业人员的私人事务与他们的专业实践无关。本文是对这一结论的回应,在此文中我将在社交媒体背景下审视专业事务与私人事务之间的关系。我还将证明,针对损害牙科行业声誉的行为采取监管行动不仅是恰当的,而且对于维护该行业与社会的关系至关重要。虽然在某种程度上有道理,但我发现阿弗莱克和麦克尼什在这个问题上的观点过于狭隘,要充分理解这个问题中的伦理困境,我们必须对专业精神的本质采取更全面的视角。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验