Dickson-Gomez Julia, McAuliffe Timothy, Quinn Katherine
Center for AIDS Intervention Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
AIDS Behav. 2017 Jul;21(7):2079-2092. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1738-1.
Research on the relationship between housing instability and HIV risk has often focused on two different conceptions of stability. In one conceptualization, housing stability is defined according to physical location with homeless or unstably housed individuals defined as those who reside in places not meant for human habitation or in emergency shelters. The other conceptualization has defined housing stability as individuals' degree of transience, often operationalized as the number of moves or evictions a person has had within a specified amount of time. Less studied has been the social context of living situation, e.g. living with other drug users, conflict over living expenses, or having to have sex in order to stay. This paper uses data from 392 low-income residents in Hartford, CT to explore how people in different housing situations-including those who are housed and homeless-experience housing stability, feelings of security in their homes, and the social context of their housing. We then explore how these varied measures of housing context affect drug use frequency and sexual risk. Results show that participants who are homeless feel more overall housing instability in terms of number of moves and negative reasons for moving. Those who were doubled up with family or friends were more likely to experience conflict over household expenses and more likely to live with drug users. Among homeless and housed, hard drug use was associated with experiencing violence in the place where they lived, perceiving greater housing stability, having moved for a positive reason, doubling up, and longer periods of homelessness, while number of moves and longer prison sentence predicted sexual risk. Among the housed, living with other drug users was associated with more hard drug use, while contributing money toward household expenses was associated with less hard drug use. Two significant interactions were associated with sexual risk among the housed. Those with longer prison sentences who lived with drug users had more sexual partners, and those with longer prison sentences who doubled up had more sex partners. Results of this study indicate that measures of housing status not often considered in the literature such as the social context of housing have significant effects on HIV risk.
关于住房不稳定与感染艾滋病毒风险之间关系的研究,常常聚焦于两种不同的稳定性概念。在一种概念中,住房稳定性是根据地理位置来定义的,无家可归者或住房不稳定者被界定为居住在不适于人类居住的地方或紧急避难所的人。另一种概念则将住房稳定性定义为个人的暂住程度,通常以一个人在特定时间内的搬家次数或被驱逐次数来衡量。对居住状况的社会背景研究较少,例如与其他吸毒者一起生活、生活费用方面的冲突,或者为了留下来而不得不发生性行为。本文利用康涅狄格州哈特福德市392名低收入居民的数据,探讨不同住房状况的人——包括有住房者和无家可归者——如何体验住房稳定性、在家中的安全感以及他们住房的社会背景。然后,我们探讨这些不同的住房环境衡量指标如何影响吸毒频率和性风险。结果显示,就搬家次数和搬家的负面原因而言,无家可归的参与者总体上感觉住房更不稳定。与家人或朋友合住的人更有可能在家庭开支方面发生冲突,也更有可能与吸毒者一起生活。在无家可归者和有住房者中,使用硬性毒品与在居住场所遭受暴力、感觉住房更稳定、因积极原因搬家、合住以及无家可归时间较长有关,而搬家次数和较长的监禁刑期则预示着性风险。在有住房者中,与其他吸毒者一起生活与更多地使用硬性毒品有关,而分担家庭开支则与较少地使用硬性毒品有关。有两个显著的相互作用与有住房者的性风险有关。监禁刑期较长且与吸毒者一起生活的人有更多性伴侣,监禁刑期较长且合住的人有更多性伴侣。这项研究的结果表明,文献中不常考虑的住房状况衡量指标,如住房的社会背景,对感染艾滋病毒风险有重大影响。