Sindel Alper, Uzuner Fatih, Sindel Muzaffer, Tozoğlu Sinan
a Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery , Akdeniz University , Antalya , Turkey.
b Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Biochemistry , Akdeniz University , Antalya , Turkey.
Cranio. 2017 Nov;35(6):405-409. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2017.1279825. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
To compare the efficacy of the double- and single-needle arthrocentesis techniques in removing methylene blue from the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) space.
This study was performed in 20 TMJs from 10 fresh cadavers. A total of 1 ml of 10 μM methylene blue solution was injected into the upper joint spaces, just prior to irrigation. Ten arthrocentesis procedures were carried out using the double-needle technique, and the remaining 10 were completed using the single-needle technique. The photo-absorbance values of methylene blue solution injected into and removed from the joint space were measured at a 665 nm wavelength. Statistical analysis was performed using Shapiro-Wilks test and t-test.
The t-test analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the two methods in the removal of methylene blue.
According to the results of the present study, the single-needle technique may be a good alternative with the advantages of easier application in cases where it is not possible to perform the double-needle technique.
比较双针和单针关节穿刺技术从颞下颌关节(TMJ)间隙清除亚甲蓝的效果。
本研究在10具新鲜尸体的20个颞下颌关节上进行。在冲洗前,将总共1毫升10微摩尔的亚甲蓝溶液注入上关节间隙。使用双针技术进行10次关节穿刺操作,其余10次使用单针技术完成。在665纳米波长下测量注入和从关节间隙清除的亚甲蓝溶液的光吸收值。使用夏皮罗-威尔克检验和t检验进行统计分析。
t检验分析表明,两种方法在清除亚甲蓝方面没有统计学上的显著差异。
根据本研究结果,单针技术可能是一种很好的替代方法,在无法进行双针技术的情况下具有应用更简便的优点。