Chen Jieyu, Xiang Hongjie, Jiang Pingping, Yu Lin, Jing Yuan, Li Fei, Wu Shengwei, Fu Xiuqiong, Liu Yanyan, Kwan Hiuyee, Luo Ren, Zhao Xiaoshan, Sun Xiaomin
School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, China.
Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Feb 28;14(3):240. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030240.
Suboptimal health status (SHS) is the intermediate health state between health and disease, it is medically undiagnosed and is also termed functional somatic syndrome. Although its clinical manifestations are complicated and various, SHS has not reached the disease status. Unhealthy lifestyle is associated with many chronic diseases and mortality. In accordance with the impact of lifestyle on health, it is intriguing to determine the association between unhealthy lifestyle and SHS risk.
We conducted a nested case-control study among healthy Chinese college students from March 2012 to September 2013, which was nested in a prospective cohort of 5676 students. We performed 1:1 incidence density sampling with matched controls for birth year, sex, grade, specialty and individual character. SHS was evaluated using the medical examination report and Sub-health Measurement Scale V1.0 (SHMS V1.0). Exposure was defined as an unhealthy lifestyle per the frequency of six behavioral dimensions from the Health-promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP-II).
We matched 543 cases of SHS (42.66%) in a cohort of 1273 students during the 1.5 years mean follow-up time with controls. A significant difference (t = 9.79, p < 0.001) and a reduction in HPLP-II total score was present at 1.5 years follow-up (135.93 ± 17.65) compared to baseline (144.48 ± 18.66). A level-response effect was recorded with an increase of the total HPLP-II (every dimension was correlated with a decreased SHS risk). Compared to respondents with the least exposure (excellent level), those reporting a general HPLP-II level were approximately 2.3 times more likely to develop SHS (odd ratio = 2.333, 95% CI = 1.471 to 3.700); and those with less HPLP-II level (good level) were approximately 1.6 times more likely (1.644, 1.119-2.414) to develop SHS (p < 0.05). Our data indicated that unhealthy lifestyle behavior with respect to behavioral dimensions significantly affected SHS likelihood. Further analyses revealed a marked increase (average increased 14.73 points) in lifestyle level among those SHS regression to health after 1.5 years, with respect to the HPLP-II behavioral dimensions, in addition to the total score (t = -15.34, p < 0.001).
SHS is highly attributable to unhealthy lifestyles, and the Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 240 2 of 17 mitigation of modifiable lifestyle risk factors may lead to SHS regression. Increased efforts to modify unhealthy lifestyles are necessary to prevent SHS.
亚健康状态(SHS)是健康与疾病之间的中间健康状态,在医学上未被诊断出来,也被称为功能性躯体综合征。尽管其临床表现复杂多样,但SHS尚未达到疾病状态。不健康的生活方式与许多慢性疾病和死亡率相关。根据生活方式对健康的影响,确定不健康生活方式与SHS风险之间的关联很有趣。
我们在2012年3月至2013年9月期间对健康的中国大学生进行了一项巢式病例对照研究,该研究嵌套在一个有5676名学生的前瞻性队列中。我们进行了1:1发病率密度抽样,并对出生年份、性别、年级、专业和个人性格进行了匹配对照。使用体检报告和亚健康测评量表V1.0(SHMS V1.0)对SHS进行评估。根据健康促进生活方式量表(HPLP-II)六个行为维度的频率,将暴露定义为不健康的生活方式。
在1273名学生的队列中,经过1.5年的平均随访时间,我们匹配了543例SHS病例(42.66%)与对照。与基线(144.48±18.66)相比,1.5年随访时HPLP-II总分有显著差异(t = 9.79,p < 0.001)且有所降低(135.93±17.65)。随着HPLP-II总分的增加记录到一种剂量反应效应(每个维度都与降低的SHS风险相关)。与暴露最少(优秀水平)的受访者相比,报告HPLP-II一般水平的受访者发生SHS的可能性大约高2.3倍(优势比 = 2.333,95%可信区间 = 1.471至3.700);而HPLP-II水平较低(良好水平)的受访者发生SHS的可能性大约高1.6倍(1.644,1.119 - 2.414)(p < 0.05)。我们的数据表明,行为维度方面不健康的生活方式行为显著影响SHS的可能性。进一步分析显示,在1.5年后SHS恢复健康的人群中,就HPLP-II行为维度以及总分而言,生活方式水平有显著提高(平均提高14.73分)(t = -15.34,p < 0.001)。
SHS高度归因于不健康的生活方式,减轻可改变的生活方式风险因素可能导致SHS恢复。有必要加大努力改变不健康的生活方式以预防SHS。