Boeijinga Anniek, Hoeken Hans, Sanders José
Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Work. 2017;56(4):539-549. doi: 10.3233/WOR-172503.
Despite various health promotion initiatives, unfavorable figures regarding Dutch truck drivers' eating behaviors, exercise behaviors, and absenteeism have not improved.
The aim was to obtain a better understanding of the low level of effectiveness of current health interventions for Dutch truck drivers by examining to what extent these are tailored to the target group's particular mindset (focus of content) and health literacy skills (presentation of content).
The article analyzes 21 health promotion materials for Dutch truck drivers using a two-step approach: (a) an analysis of the materials' focus, guided by the Health Action Process Approach; and (b) an argumentation analysis, guided by pragma-dialectics.
The corpus analysis revealed: (a) a predominant focus on the motivation phase; and (b) in line with the aim of motivating the target group, a consistent use of pragmatic arguments, which were typically presented in an implicit way.
The results indicate that existing health promotion materials for Dutch truck drivers are not sufficiently tailored to the target group's mindset and health literacy skills. Recommendations are offered to develop more tailored/effective health interventions targeting this high-risk, underserved occupational group.
尽管开展了各种健康促进举措,但荷兰卡车司机的饮食行为、运动行为及旷工方面的不良数据并未得到改善。
通过研究当前针对荷兰卡车司机的健康干预措施在多大程度上符合目标群体的特定思维模式(内容重点)和健康素养技能(内容呈现方式),从而更好地理解这些干预措施效果不佳的原因。
本文采用两步法分析了21份针对荷兰卡车司机的健康促进材料:(a)以健康行动过程方法为指导,分析材料的重点;(b)以语用辩证法为指导,进行论证分析。
语料库分析显示:(a)主要侧重于动机阶段;(b)为符合激励目标群体的目的,一致使用了务实论证,且通常以隐含方式呈现。
结果表明,现有的针对荷兰卡车司机的健康促进材料并未充分考虑目标群体的思维模式和健康素养技能。针对这一高风险、服务不足的职业群体,本文提出了开发更具针对性/有效性的健康干预措施的建议。