Suppr超能文献

治疗期间血小板高反应性的决定因素以及VerifyNow检测法与Multiplate检测法之间的一致性

Determinants of high on-treatment platelet reactivity and agreement between VerifyNow and Multiplate assays.

作者信息

Danielak Dorota, Komosa Anna, Tomczak Aleksandra, Graczyk-Szuster Agnieszka, Lesiak Maciej, Główka Franciszek, Karaźniewicz-Łada Marta

机构信息

a Department of Physical Pharmacy and Pharmacokinetics , Poznan University of Medical Sciences , Poznań , Poland.

b 1st Department of Cardiology , Poznan University of Medical Sciences , Poznań , Poland.

出版信息

Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2017 May;77(3):190-198. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2017.1286686. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

Abstract

Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel is a regimen used before and after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Point-of-care platelet reactivity assays are easy-to-use methods to determine adequate response to the drug. The aim of this study was a comparison of the two platelet reactivity assays: Multiplate and VerifyNow and an identification of factors potentially influencing the results of these tests, including common genetic polymorphisms. The study included 39 patients receiving 75 mg clopidogrel daily before angioplasty with DES implantation. Platelet reactivity was measured with Multiplate and P2Y VerifyNow assays. Genetic polymorphisms of CYP2C192, ABCB1 3435C > T, and CYP3A41G were determined with PCR-RFLP method and CYP2C19*17 was determined by means of an allele-specific PCR. Agreement between Multiplate and VerifyNow assays was poor (Cohen's κ = 0.056, p = .273). Hematocrit significantly negatively correlated with VerifyNow assayed platelet reactivity (r = -.487, p = .002). Female sex was significantly associated with higher VerifyNow assay results after adjustment to hematocrit (253.2 ± 47.6 PRU vs. 195.9 ± 56.9 PRU, p = .013) and the prevalence of high-on-treatment platelet reactivity (OR: 8.50; 95% CI 1.13-77.60, p = .024). Reactivity measured with Multiplate was lower in women (82.3 vs. 175.6 AU·min, p = .037) and in patients who received calcium channel blockers (74.7 vs. 191.7 AU·min, p = .002). None of the studied polymorphisms significantly influenced platelet aggregation measurements. In conclusion, different aspects modify between-patient variability of the Multiplate and VerifyNow assays and agreement between those two assays was poor.

摘要

氯吡格雷双重抗血小板治疗是药物洗脱支架(DES)植入前后使用的一种治疗方案。即时血小板反应性检测是确定药物充分反应的易用方法。本研究的目的是比较两种血小板反应性检测方法:Multiplate和VerifyNow,并确定可能影响这些检测结果的因素,包括常见的基因多态性。该研究纳入了39例在接受DES植入的血管成形术前每日服用75mg氯吡格雷的患者。使用Multiplate和P2Y VerifyNow检测方法测量血小板反应性。采用PCR-RFLP方法检测CYP2C192、ABCB1 3435C>T和CYP3A41G的基因多态性,采用等位基因特异性PCR检测CYP2C19*17。Multiplate和VerifyNow检测方法之间的一致性较差(Cohen's κ = 0.056,p = 0.273)。血细胞比容与VerifyNow检测的血小板反应性显著负相关(r = -0.487,p = 0.002)。在调整血细胞比容后,女性与VerifyNow检测结果较高显著相关(253.2±47.6 PRU对195.9±56.9 PRU,p = 0.013)以及治疗中高血小板反应性的患病率(OR:8.50;95%CI 1.13-77.60,p = 0.024)。女性(82.3对175.6 AU·min,p = 0.037)和接受钙通道阻滞剂的患者(74.7对191.7 AU·min,p = 0.002)中,用Multiplate测量的反应性较低。所研究的多态性均未显著影响血小板聚集测量。总之,不同方面改变了Multiplate和VerifyNow检测方法在患者间的变异性,且这两种检测方法之间的一致性较差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验