Mondlane Gracinda, Gubanski Michael, Lind Pehr A, Ureba Ana, Siegbahn Albert
a Department of Physics - Medical Radiation Physics , Stockholm University , Stockholm , Sweden.
b Department of Physics , Universidade Eduardo Mondlane , Maputo , Mozambique.
Acta Oncol. 2017 Jun;56(6):832-838. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1297536. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
Proton-beam therapy of large abdominal cancers has been questioned due to the large variations in tissue density in the abdomen. The aim of this study was to evaluate the importance of these variations for the dose distributions produced in adjuvant radiotherapy of gastric cancer (GC), implemented with photon-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or with proton-beam single-field uniform-dose (SFUD) method.
Eight GC patients were included in this study. For each patient, a VMAT- and an SFUD-plan were created. The prescription dose was 45 Gy (IsoE) given in 25 fractions. The plans were prepared on the original CT studies and the doses were thereafter recalculated on two modified CT studies (one with extra water filling and the other with expanded abdominal air-cavity volumes).
Compared to the original VMAT plans, the SFUD plans resulted in reduced median values for the V18 of the left kidney (26%), the liver mean dose (14.8 Gy (IsoE)) and the maximum dose given to the spinal cord (26.6 Gy (IsoE)). However, the PTV coverage decreased when the SFUD plans were recalculated on CT sets with extra air- (86%) and water-filling (87%). The added water filling only led to minor dosimetric changes for the OARs, but the extra air caused significant increases of the median values of V18 for the right and left kidneys (10% and 12%, respectively) and of V10 for the liver (12%). The density changes influenced the dose distributions in the VMAT plans to a minor extent.
SFUD was found to be superior to VMAT for the plans prepared on the original CT sets. However, SFUD was inferior to VMAT for the modified CT sets.
由于腹部组织密度差异较大,腹部大型癌症的质子束治疗受到质疑。本研究的目的是评估这些差异对于采用基于光子的容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)或质子束单野均匀剂量(SFUD)方法实施的胃癌(GC)辅助放疗中产生的剂量分布的重要性。
本研究纳入了8例GC患者。为每位患者创建了一个VMAT计划和一个SFUD计划。处方剂量为45 Gy(等中心剂量),分25次给予。计划在原始CT研究上制定,之后在两项修改后的CT研究上重新计算剂量(一项增加了水填充,另一项扩大了腹部气腔体积)。
与原始VMAT计划相比,SFUD计划使左肾V18的中位数降低(26%),肝脏平均剂量降低(14.8 Gy(等中心剂量)),脊髓接受的最大剂量降低(26.6 Gy(等中心剂量))。然而,当在增加空气(86%)和水填充(87%)的CT数据集上重新计算SFUD计划时,计划靶体积(PTV)的覆盖率降低。增加水填充仅导致危及器官(OARs)的剂量学变化较小,但额外的空气导致右肾和左肾V18的中位数显著增加(分别为10%和12%),肝脏V10的中位数增加(12%)。密度变化对VMAT计划中的剂量分布影响较小。
在原始CT数据集上制定的计划中,SFUD优于VMAT。然而,在修改后的CT数据集上,SFUD不如VMAT。