Abell Sally K, Suen Matthew, Pease Anthony, Boyle Jacqueline A, Soldatos Georgia, Regan John, Wallace Euan M, Teede Helena J
1 Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University , Clayton, Australia .
2 Diabetes and Vascular Medicine Unit , Monash Health, Clayton, Australia .
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 May;19(5):280-287. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0412. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
We aimed to compare glycemic control, insulin requirements, and outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes in pregnancy treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and multiple daily injections (MDI).
A retrospective cohort study was conducted of singleton pregnancies (>20 weeks gestation) in women with type 1 diabetes (2010-2015) at a specialist multidisciplinary maternity network in Australia. Antenatal characteristics, diabetes history and treatment details, and maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared for women with type 1 diabetes using CSII and MDI. Bolus calculator settings were reviewed for CSII. Data were obtained from individual medical records, linkage to pathology, and the Birthing Outcomes System database.
There were no differences in maternal characteristics or diabetes history between women managed with CSII (n = 40) and MDI (n = 127). Women treated with CSII required less insulin and less increase in total daily insulin dose/kg than MDI (40% vs. 52%). Both groups achieved similar glycemic control and no differences in pregnancy outcome. In the CSII group, carbohydrate:insulin ratios were intensified across gestation (30% breakfast, 27% lunch, 22% dinner), and insulin sensitivity factors (ISFs) changed little (7% breakfast, 0% lunch, -10% dinner).
There was no difference in glycemic control or pregnancy outcomes in women using CSII or MDI managed in a multidisciplinary setting. Greater adjustments are needed to ISFs with CSII therapy. Overall, these data do not support recommending CSII in pregnancy with potentially higher patient and staff demands and costs and lack of improvement in HbA1c and pregnancy outcomes.
我们旨在比较接受持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)和多次皮下注射(MDI)治疗的1型糖尿病妊娠女性的血糖控制情况、胰岛素需求量及结局。
对澳大利亚一个专科多学科产科网络中1型糖尿病女性(2010 - 2015年)的单胎妊娠(妊娠>20周)进行回顾性队列研究。比较使用CSII和MDI的1型糖尿病女性的产前特征、糖尿病病史及治疗细节,以及母婴结局。对CSII的大剂量计算器设置进行了审查。数据来自个人病历、与病理检查的关联以及分娩结局系统数据库。
接受CSII治疗的女性(n = 40)和接受MDI治疗的女性(n = 127)在母亲特征或糖尿病病史方面没有差异。与MDI组相比,接受CSII治疗的女性所需胰岛素更少,每日每千克体重总胰岛素剂量增加更少(40%对52%)。两组血糖控制情况相似,妊娠结局无差异。在CSII组中,碳水化合物:胰岛素比值在整个孕期有所强化(早餐30%,午餐27%,晚餐22%),而胰岛素敏感性因子(ISF)变化不大(早餐7%,午餐0%,晚餐 - 10%)。
在多学科环境中管理的使用CSII或MDI的女性,其血糖控制或妊娠结局没有差异。CSII治疗需要对ISF进行更大幅度的调整。总体而言,这些数据不支持在妊娠时推荐CSII,因为其对患者和医护人员的要求及成本可能更高,且糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和妊娠结局并无改善。