van Hoorn Bastiaan T, Pong Taylor, van Leeuwen Wouter F, Ring David
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 May;42(5):329-334. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
Carpal coalitions are common and usually incidental to the indication for wrist radiographs. It is not clear if, or when, carpal coalitions cause pain. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of incidental carpal coalitions by evaluating radiographs taken for various indications and to test the association of demographic variables and ordering indications with the finding of a carpal coalition.
We reviewed 1,119 posteroanterior wrist radiographs for the presence of carpal coalition. We used bivariate and multivariate analyses to assess demographic factors for their independent associations with the presence of carpal coalitions and to compare the difference in the prevalence of carpal coalitions between radiographs obtained to evaluate traumatic wrist pain (623 wrists), nontraumatic wrist pain (175 wrists), and other reasons (321 wrists).
Radiographs of 98 out of 1,119 patients (8.8%) showed a carpal coalition. Carpal coalitions were equally likely on radiographs obtained for traumatic wrist pain and nontraumatic wrist pain. Patients with no wrist trauma or wrist pain were less likely to have a carpal coalition on their radiograph.
We consider carpal coalitions an unlikely cause of wrist pain. The lower prevalence in radiographs obtained for causes other than wrist trauma or wrist pain remains unexplained, although it may be spurious. In the evaluation of a patient with nonspecific wrist pain, clinicians should be careful ascribing symptoms to anatomical variations on radiographs. These incidental findings should not usually affect management.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic III.
腕骨联合较为常见,通常在进行腕部X线检查时偶然发现。目前尚不清楚腕骨联合是否会引起疼痛,以及何时会引起疼痛。本研究的目的是通过评估因各种指征拍摄的X线片,评估偶然发现的腕骨联合的患病率,并检验人口统计学变量和检查指征与腕骨联合发现之间的关联。
我们回顾了1119张腕部后前位X线片,以确定是否存在腕骨联合。我们使用双变量和多变量分析来评估人口统计学因素与腕骨联合存在之间的独立关联,并比较为评估创伤性腕部疼痛(623例)、非创伤性腕部疼痛(175例)和其他原因(321例)而拍摄的X线片之间腕骨联合患病率的差异。
1119例患者中有98例(8.8%)的X线片显示存在腕骨联合。创伤性腕部疼痛和非创伤性腕部疼痛的X线片上出现腕骨联合的可能性相同。无腕部创伤或腕部疼痛的患者X线片上出现腕骨联合的可能性较小。
我们认为腕骨联合不太可能是腕部疼痛的原因。除腕部创伤或腕部疼痛以外的原因导致的X线片上腕骨联合患病率较低,其原因尚不清楚,尽管可能是假阳性。在评估非特异性腕部疼痛的患者时,临床医生应谨慎将症状归因于X线片上的解剖变异。这些偶然发现通常不应影响治疗管理。
研究类型/证据水平:诊断性研究III级