Kirkpatrick Sharon I, Vanderlee Lana, Raffoul Amanda, Stapleton Jackie, Csizmadi Ilona, Boucher Beatrice A, Massarelli Isabelle, Rondeau Isabelle, Robson Paula J
School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada;
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;
Adv Nutr. 2017 Mar 15;8(2):276-289. doi: 10.3945/an.116.014027. Print 2017 Mar.
Choosing the most appropriate dietary assessment tool for a study can be a challenge. Through a scoping review, we characterized self-report tools used to assess diet in Canada to identify patterns in tool use and to inform strategies to strengthen nutrition research. The research databases Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were used to identify Canadian studies published from 2009 to 2014 that included a self-report assessment of dietary intake. The search elicited 2358 records that were screened to identify those that reported on self-report dietary intake among nonclinical, non-Aboriginal adult populations. A pool of 189 articles (reflecting 92 studies) was examined in-depth to assess the dietary assessment tools used. Food-frequency questionnaires (FFQs) and screeners were used in 64% of studies, whereas food records and 24-h recalls were used in 18% and 14% of studies, respectively. Three studies (3%) used a single question to assess diet, and for 3 studies the tool used was not clear. A variety of distinct FFQs and screeners, including those developed and/or adapted for use in Canada and those developed elsewhere, were used. Some tools were reported to have been evaluated previously in terms of validity or reliability, but details of psychometric testing were often lacking. Energy and fat were the most commonly studied, reported by 42% and 39% of studies, respectively. For ∼20% of studies, dietary data were used to assess dietary quality or patterns, whereas close to half assessed ≤5 dietary components. A variety of dietary assessment tools are used in Canadian research. Strategies to improve the application of current evidence on best practices in dietary assessment have the potential to support a stronger and more cohesive literature on diet and health. Such strategies could benefit from national and global collaboration.
为一项研究选择最合适的饮食评估工具可能是一项挑战。通过范围综述,我们对加拿大用于评估饮食的自我报告工具进行了特征描述,以确定工具使用模式,并为加强营养研究的策略提供信息。研究数据库Medline、PubMed、PsycINFO和CINAHL被用于识别2009年至2014年发表的加拿大研究,这些研究包括饮食摄入量的自我报告评估。搜索共得到2358条记录,经过筛选以确定那些报告非临床、非原住民成年人群自我报告饮食摄入量的记录。对189篇文章(反映92项研究)进行了深入研究,以评估所使用的饮食评估工具。64%的研究使用了食物频率问卷(FFQ)和筛查工具,而分别有18%和14%的研究使用了食物记录和24小时回忆法。三项研究(3%)使用单个问题评估饮食,另有三项研究使用的工具不明确。使用了各种不同的FFQ和筛查工具,包括为在加拿大使用而开发和/或改编的工具以及在其他地方开发的工具。一些工具据报道之前已经在有效性或可靠性方面进行了评估,但往往缺乏心理测量测试的细节。能量和脂肪是研究最普遍的,分别有42%和39%的研究报告过。约20%的研究使用饮食数据评估饮食质量或模式,而近一半的研究评估的饮食成分≤5种。加拿大研究中使用了多种饮食评估工具。改进当前饮食评估最佳实践证据应用的策略有可能支持形成关于饮食与健康的更强有力和更具凝聚力的文献。此类策略可能受益于国家和全球合作。