Suppr超能文献

猪模型中腹腔镜经胃环形吻合器辅助与内镜下食管黏膜切除术的比较

Laparoscopic transgastric circumferential stapler-assisted vs. endoscopic esophageal mucosectomy in a porcine model.

作者信息

Steinemann Daniel C, Zerz Andreas, Müller Philip C, Sauer Peter, Schaible Anja, Lasitschka Felix, Schwarz Anne-Catherine, Müller-Stich Beat P, Linke Georg R

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

St. Claraspital AG, Departement of Surgery, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2017 Jul;49(7):668-674. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-103407. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

Abstract

Extensive endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for Barrett's esophagus (BE) may lead to stenosis. Laparoscopic, transgastric, stapler-assisted mucosectomy (SAM) with the retrieval of a circumferential specimen is proposed.  SAM was evaluated in two phases. The feasibility of SAM and the quality of specimens were assessed in eight animals. The mucosal healing was evaluated in a 6-week survival experiment comparing SAM (n = 6) with EMR (n = 6). The ratio of the esophageal lumen width (REL) at the resection level measured on fluoroscopy at 6 weeks divided by the width immediately after resection was compared.  In all animals, a circular mucosectomy specimen was successfully obtained, with a median area of 492 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 426 - 573 mm) and 941 mm (IQR 813 - 1209 mm) using a 21 mm and 25 mm stapler, respectively. In the survival experiments, symptomatic stenosis developed in two animals after EMR and in none after SAM. The REL was 0.27 (0.18 - 0.39) and 0.96 (0.9 - 1.04;  < 0.0001) for EMR and SAM, respectively.  SAM provides a novel technique for en bloc mucosectomy in BE. In contrast to EMR, mucosal healing after SAM was not associated with stenosis up to 6 weeks after intervention.

摘要

广泛内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)治疗巴雷特食管(BE)可能导致狭窄。本文提出采用腹腔镜经胃吻合器辅助黏膜切除术(SAM)并获取环形标本。SAM分两个阶段进行评估。在八只动物身上评估了SAM的可行性和标本质量。在一项为期6周的生存实验中,比较了SAM组(n = 6)和EMR组(n = 6)的黏膜愈合情况。比较了术后6周通过透视测量的切除水平处食管腔宽度比(REL)与切除后即刻宽度的比值。在所有动物中,分别使用21毫米和25毫米吻合器成功获取了圆形黏膜切除标本,标本中位面积分别为492平方毫米(四分位间距[IQR] 426 - 573平方毫米)和941平方毫米(IQR 813 - 1209平方毫米)。在生存实验中,EMR术后有两只动物出现症状性狭窄,而SAM术后无动物出现。EMR组和SAM组的REL分别为0.27(0.18 - 0.39)和0.96(0.9 - 1.04;P < 0.0001)。SAM为BE的整块黏膜切除术提供了一种新技术。与EMR不同,SAM术后至干预后6周黏膜愈合未出现狭窄。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验