Moehrlin Gregory S, Juliano Steven A
Department of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790-4120, USA e-mail:
Oecologia. 1998 Jul;115(4):492-500. doi: 10.1007/s004420050546.
We tested alternative developmental hypotheses describing when during an insect oviposition cycle reproductive tactics are determined. Newly eclosed adult females of the grasshopper Romalea guttata were raised on eight different feeding treatments consisting of a low food diet, a high food diet, and changes from high to low food, or low to high food, at different times during the first oviposition cycle. When initial food availability was high, a decline in food availability >7 days after adult eclosion produced no significant increase in time to oviposition compared to constant high food. In contrast, when initial food availability was low, an increase in food availability as late as day 14 produced a significant decrease in time to oviposition compared to constant low food. Thus, time to oviposition is determined by feeding rate early in the oviposition cycle, but the time of this determination is later when food availability is lower. Masses of individual eggs were unaffected by these treatments. When initial food availability was high, a decrease in food availability on day 21 produced no significant change in numbers of eggs in a clutch compared to constant high food. In contrast, when initial food availability was low, an increase in food availability after day 7 produced no significant change in number of eggs in a clutch compared to constant low food. Changes in egg production resulted from oocyte resorption, which appeared to become unresponsive to food availability between day 14 and day 21. Our results refute the hypothesis that reproductive tactics are continuously flexible. Development toward oviposition seems to be structured so that reproductive tactics become independent of feeding late during the first oviposition cycle. Reproductive tactics become unresponsive to food at different times for groups initially receiving low or high food, suggesting that a particular developmental state, rather than some absolute time, marks the shift to development that is unresponsive to␣food. Plasticity in reproductive tactics appears to be␣controlled by hormones in a manner similar to the hormonal control of plasticity of metamorphosis in other insects.
我们测试了关于昆虫产卵周期中生殖策略何时被确定的不同发育假说。将刚羽化的美洲沙漠蝗成年雌虫饲养在八种不同的喂食处理条件下,这些处理包括低食物量饮食、高食物量饮食,以及在第一个产卵周期的不同时间从高食物量变为低食物量,或从低食物量变为高食物量。当初始食物可获得性高时,与持续高食物量相比,成虫羽化7天后食物可获得性下降并未使产卵时间显著增加。相反,当初始食物可获得性低时,直到第14天食物可获得性增加,与持续低食物量相比,产卵时间显著减少。因此,产卵时间由产卵周期早期的进食速率决定,但当食物可获得性较低时,这一决定时间会更晚。单个卵的质量不受这些处理的影响。当初始食物可获得性高时,与持续高食物量相比,第21天食物可获得性下降并未使一窝卵的数量发生显著变化。相反,当初始食物可获得性低时,与持续低食物量相比,第7天后食物可获得性增加并未使一窝卵的数量发生显著变化。产卵量的变化是由卵母细胞吸收导致的,卵母细胞吸收在第14天到第21天之间似乎对食物可获得性不再有反应。我们的结果反驳了生殖策略具有持续灵活性的假说。向产卵的发育似乎是有结构的,以至于生殖策略在第一个产卵周期后期变得独立于进食。对于最初接受低食物量或高食物量的群体,生殖策略在不同时间对食物不再有反应,这表明是特定的发育状态而非某个绝对时间标志着向对食物无反应的发育转变。生殖策略的可塑性似乎以类似于其他昆虫变态可塑性的激素控制方式受到激素控制。