Stenseth Nils Chr
Zoological Institute, University of Oslo, Blindern, P.O. Box 1050, Oslo 3, Norway.
Oecologia. 1978 Jan;32(1):37-55. doi: 10.1007/BF00344688.
A graphic model based on cost and gain functions is developed for predicting the relative magnitude of the Malthusian parameter, m, for different phenotypes. The analysis is mainly restricted to grazing small rodents. The cost function is derived by depicting the probability of death due to predation, parasitism etc. as a function of time spent outside the nest. The gain function is derived by comparing the energy obtained by digestion, with energy used (or needed) for maintenance metabolism, both when outside and inside the nest.The model is applied for predicting the relative magnitude of the Malthusian parameter of small versus large phenotypes of grazing rodents. Of these, the smaller phenotypes are concluded to have the larger Malthusian parameter. This may not hold true for hunters (granivores and predators). These conclusions are used for reinterpreting the often observed geographical size trend in warm-blooded vertebrates (Bergmann's rule).The model is further applied to the determination of the relative magnitude of the Malthusian parameter for aggresive and docile strategies hypothesized in Chitty's theory for fluctuating populations. Of these, the aggressive strategy is concluded to have the lowest Malthusian parameter. Although not verifying Chitty's theory, these results support the earlier hypothesis that the aggressive strategy may under certain situations have lower survival. Based on the present model, nothing can be said about whether or not a polymorphic population as hypothesized by Chitty will exhibit oscillations.
开发了一种基于成本和收益函数的图形模型,用于预测不同表型的马尔萨斯参数m的相对大小。分析主要限于草食性小型啮齿动物。成本函数通过将因捕食、寄生等导致的死亡概率描述为在巢外花费时间的函数来推导。收益函数通过比较在巢外和巢内时消化获得的能量与维持代谢所使用(或需要)的能量来推导。该模型用于预测草食性啮齿动物小表型与大表型的马尔萨斯参数的相对大小。其中,较小的表型被认为具有较大的马尔萨斯参数。这对于肉食动物(食谷动物和食肉动物)可能不成立。这些结论用于重新解释温血脊椎动物中经常观察到的地理尺寸趋势(伯格曼法则)。该模型进一步应用于确定奇蒂波动种群理论中假设的攻击性和温顺策略的马尔萨斯参数的相对大小。其中,攻击性策略被认为具有最低的马尔萨斯参数。虽然没有验证奇蒂的理论,但这些结果支持了早期的假设,即攻击性策略在某些情况下可能具有较低的存活率。基于当前模型,无法确定奇蒂假设的多态种群是否会出现振荡。