Price Mary V
Department of Biology, University of California, 92521, Riverside, CA, USA.
Oecologia. 1983 Sep;59(2-3):384-392. doi: 10.1007/BF00378866.
Recent models exploring the ecological consequences of body size have assumed that its primary effect is to determine how easily individual prey of different sizes can be pursued or handled. However, for predators that eat small, particulate food, size-related costs associated with finding and harvesting prey should be at least as important as those associated with consuming individual prey once thay have been harvested. Such predators should have generalized diets, and body size differences would not be expected to influence substantially the sizes of prey eaten. The effect of body size on spatial patterns of foraging could, however, be substantial for these predators if prey have a patchy distribution.I develop a simple model for a particle feeder foraging in patchy environments and use it to examine the special case of patch choice by seed-eating desert rodents. The model implies that for most parameter values large and small animals should specialize to different extents on the most profitable patches. Size differences among coexisting desert rodents therefore can be expected to promote partitioning of food by differential patch choice. Preliminary observations of desert rodent seed dispersion and microhabitat preferences indicate that interspecific differences in patch choice do exist.The model predicts that the nature of the relationship between size and patch choice depends on the values taken by certain model parameters. Thus, although the model predicts that patch choice generally should vary with body size, the spatial scale of patchiness and the way in which within-patch harvest rates and between-patch travel velocities scale with size determine whether, and in what way, body size should affect patch choice. As yet estimates of these parameters for heteromyid rodents are not precise enough for us to have much confidence in specific model predictions about this system. However, it will only be a matter of time before we can derive better estimates; in principle the model is testable, and when suitably modified should be applicable to many systems.
近期探索体型生态后果的模型假定,其主要作用是确定不同体型的单个猎物被捕食或处理的难易程度。然而,对于以小型颗粒食物为食的捕食者来说,与寻找和获取猎物相关的体型成本至少与捕获猎物后消耗单个猎物的成本一样重要。这类捕食者应具有多样化的食谱,且体型差异预计不会对所食猎物的大小产生实质性影响。然而,如果猎物分布不均,体型对觅食空间模式的影响对这些捕食者来说可能很大。我为在斑块状环境中觅食的颗粒食物捕食者建立了一个简单模型,并利用它来研究食种子沙漠啮齿动物选择斑块的特殊情况。该模型表明,对于大多数参数值,大型和小型动物应在不同程度上专门选择最有利可图的斑块。因此,可以预期共存的沙漠啮齿动物之间的体型差异会通过不同的斑块选择促进食物的划分。对沙漠啮齿动物种子散布和微生境偏好的初步观察表明,斑块选择上确实存在种间差异。该模型预测,体型与斑块选择之间关系的性质取决于某些模型参数的值。因此,尽管该模型预测斑块选择通常应随体型变化,但斑块的空间尺度以及斑块内收获率和斑块间移动速度随体型变化的方式决定了体型是否以及以何种方式影响斑块选择。目前,对异鼠科啮齿动物这些参数的估计还不够精确,以至于我们对关于这个系统的具体模型预测没有太多信心。然而,获得更好估计只是时间问题;原则上该模型是可测试的,经过适当修改后应该适用于许多系统。