Zahangir M S, Hasan M M, Richardson A, Tabassum S
Department of Statistics, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Department of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, Australia.
Nutr Diabetes. 2017 Mar 20;7(3):e250. doi: 10.1038/nutd.2017.2.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: This study aims at examining the urban-rural differentials in the effects of socioeconomic predictors on underweight and obesity of ever-married women in Bangladesh. The effect of malnutrition and other risk factors on non-communicable diseases is also examined.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: The information regarding nutritional status, socioeconomic and demographic background, and non-communicable diseases of ever-married women was extracted from the nationally representative, cross-sectional Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS 2011) data set. Both bivariate (χ test) and multivariate (multinomial logistic regression model) analyses were performed in determining the risk factors of malnutrition. The effect of malnutrition and associated risk factors on non-communicable diseases was determined using binary logistic regression models.
The overall prevalence as well as the effects of individual risk factors of malnutrition differ in urban and rural settings. Regional differentials in the prevalence of underweight were statistically significant only for rural areas. In rural and urban settings, women from households with poor economic status were 67% (odds ratio (OR) 0.33, 95% CI 0.26-0.43) and 81% (OR=0.19, 95% CI 0.13-0.29) less likely to be overweight, respectively, with respect to those from affluent households. Women from the Rangpur division were significantly more likely to suffer from anemia (OR=1.41, 95% CI 1.13-1.77) and hypertension (OR=1.67, 95% CI 1.19-2.34) than those from the Sylhet division (reference division). With respect to those considered as underweight, women who were categorized as overweight were 0.47 (OR=0.53, 95% CI 0.43-0.65) times less likely to suffer from anemia, and 1.83 (OR=2.83, 95% CI 1.99-4.02) and 1.70 (OR=2.70, 95% CI 2.09-3.50) times more likely to suffer from diabetes and hypertension, respectively.
Rural-urban differentials in the effects of individual risk factors of malnutrition were observed. Wealth status of households and nutritional status of women showed significant effect on the prevalence of anemia, diabetes and hypertension.
背景/目的:本研究旨在探讨社会经济预测因素对孟加拉国已婚妇女体重过轻和肥胖影响的城乡差异。同时也研究了营养不良及其他风险因素对非传染性疾病的影响。
对象/方法:有关已婚妇女营养状况、社会经济和人口背景以及非传染性疾病的信息,取自具有全国代表性的横断面孟加拉国人口与健康调查(2011年孟加拉国人口与健康调查)数据集。在确定营养不良的风险因素时,进行了双变量(χ检验)和多变量(多项逻辑回归模型)分析。使用二元逻辑回归模型确定营养不良及相关风险因素对非传染性疾病的影响。
营养不良的总体患病率以及各个风险因素的影响在城乡环境中有所不同。体重过轻患病率的地区差异仅在农村地区具有统计学意义。在农村和城市地区,经济状况较差家庭的妇女超重的可能性分别比富裕家庭的妇女低67%(优势比(OR)0.33,95%置信区间0.26 - 0.43)和81%(OR = 0.19,95%置信区间0.13 - 0.29)。与锡尔赫特专区(参照专区)的妇女相比,朗布尔专区的妇女患贫血(OR = 1.41,95%置信区间1.13 - 1.77)和高血压(OR = 1.67,95%置信区间1.19 - 2.34)的可能性显著更高。与体重过轻的妇女相比,超重的妇女患贫血的可能性低0.47倍(OR = 0.53,95%置信区间0.43 - 0.65),患糖尿病的可能性高1.83倍(OR = 2.83,95%置信区间1.99 - 4.02),患高血压的可能性高1.70倍(OR = 2.70,95%置信区间2.09 - 3.50)。
观察到营养不良各个风险因素影响的城乡差异。家庭财富状况和妇女营养状况对贫血、糖尿病和高血压的患病率有显著影响。