Falade-Nwulia Oluwaseun, Suarez-Cuervo Catalina, Nelson David R, Fried Michael W, Segal Jodi B, Sulkowski Mark S
From Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Ann Intern Med. 2017 May 2;166(9):637-648. doi: 10.7326/M16-2575. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
Rapid improvements in hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy have led to the approval of multiple oral direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of chronic HCV infection.
To summarize published literature on the efficacy and safety of oral DAAs for treatment of persons with chronic HCV infection.
MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception through 1 November 2016.
42 English-language studies from controlled and single-group registered clinical trials of adults with HCV infection that evaluated at least 8 weeks of an FDA-approved interferon-free HCV regimen that included at least 2 DAAs.
Two investigators abstracted data on study design, patient characteristics, and virologic and safety outcomes sequentially and assessed quality independently.
Six DAA regimens showed high sustained virologic response (SVR) rates (>95%) in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection without cirrhosis, including those with HIV co-infection. Effective treatments for HCV genotype 3 infection are limited (2 DAA regimens). Patients with hepatic decompensation, particularly those with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C disease, had lower SVR rates (78% to 87%) than other populations. The addition of ribavirin was associated with increased SVR rates for certain DAA regimens and patient groups. Overall rates of serious adverse events and treatment discontinuation were low (<10% in the general population); regimens that included ribavirin had more mild or moderate adverse events than those without.
Twenty-three studies had moderate risk of bias (10 were open-label single-group trials, 11 had limited information on concealment of the allocation scheme, and 5 had selective outcome reporting). All but 1 of the studies were industry-funded. Heterogeneity of interventions precluded pooling.
Multiple oral DAA regimens show high rates of safety, tolerability, and efficacy for treatment of HCV genotype 1 infection, particularly among persons without cirrhosis.
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. (PROSPERO: CRD42014009711).
丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)治疗的快速进展促使美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准了多种口服直接抗病毒药物(DAA)方案用于治疗慢性HCV感染。
总结已发表的关于口服DAA治疗慢性HCV感染者的疗效和安全性的文献。
截至2016年11月1日的MEDLINE和EMBASE。
42项英文研究,来自对HCV感染成人进行的对照和单组注册临床试验,评估了至少8周的FDA批准的不含干扰素的HCV方案,该方案至少包含2种DAA。
两名研究人员依次提取关于研究设计、患者特征以及病毒学和安全性结果的数据,并独立评估质量。
六种DAA方案在无肝硬化的HCV基因1型感染患者中显示出高持续病毒学应答(SVR)率(>95%),包括合并HIV感染的患者。针对HCV基因3型感染的有效治疗方法有限(2种DAA方案)。肝失代偿患者,尤其是Child-Turcotte-Pugh C级疾病患者,SVR率低于其他人群(78%至87%)。对于某些DAA方案和患者群体,添加利巴韦林与SVR率增加相关。严重不良事件和治疗中断的总体发生率较低(普通人群中<10%);包含利巴韦林的方案比不包含的方案有更多轻度或中度不良事件。
23项研究存在中度偏倚风险(10项为开放标签单组试验,11项关于分配方案隐藏的信息有限,5项有选择性结果报告)。除1项研究外,所有研究均由行业资助。干预措施的异质性妨碍了合并分析。
多种口服DAA方案在治疗HCV基因1型感染方面显示出高安全性、耐受性和疗效,尤其是在无肝硬化的人群中。
以患者为中心的结果研究机构。(国际系统评价注册库:CRD42014009711)