Masarova Lucia, Kantarjian Hagop, Garcia-Mannero Guillermo, Ravandi Farhad, Sharma Padmanee, Daver Naval
Department of Leukemia, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Immunotherapy Platform, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;995:73-95. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-53156-4_4.
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common leukemia among adults and is associated with a poor prognosis, especially in patients with adverse prognostic factors, older age, or relapsed disease. The last decade has seen a surge in successful immune-based therapies in various solid tumors; however, the role of immune therapies in AML remains poorly defined. This chapter describes the rationale, clinical data, and toxicity profiles of immune-based therapeutic modalities in AML including naked and conjugated monoclonal antibodies, bispecific T-cell engager antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, and checkpoint blockade via blockade of PD1/PDL1 or CTLA4. Monoclonal antibodies commonly used in AML therapy target highly expressed "leukemia" surface antigens and include (1) naked antibodies against common myeloid markers such as anti-CD33 (e.g., lintuzumab), (2) antibody-drug conjugates linked to either, (a) a highly potent toxin such as calicheamicin, pyrrolobenzodiazepine, maytansine, or others in various anti-CD33 (gemtuzumab ozogamicin, SGN 33A), anti-123 (SL-401), and anti-CD56 (lorvotuzumab mertansine) formulations, or (b) radioactive particles, such as I, Bi, or Ac-labeled anti-CD33 or CD45 antibodies. Novel monoclonal antibodies that recruit and promote proximity-induced cytotoxicity of tumor cells by T cells (bispecific T-cell engager [BiTE] such as anti CD33/CD3, e.g., AMG 330) or block immune checkpoint pathways such as CTLA4 (e.g., ipilimumab) or PD1/PD-L1 (e.g., nivolumab) unleashing the patients T cells to fight leukemic cells are being evaluated in clinical trials in patients with AML. The numerous ongoing clinical trials with immunotherapies in AML will improve our understanding of the biology of AML and allow us to determine the best approaches to immunotherapy in AML.
急性髓系白血病(AML)是成人中最常见的白血病,预后较差,尤其是在具有不良预后因素、年龄较大或疾病复发的患者中。在过去十年中,各种实体瘤的基于免疫的成功疗法激增;然而,免疫疗法在AML中的作用仍不明确。本章描述了AML中基于免疫的治疗方式的基本原理、临床数据和毒性特征,包括裸抗体和偶联单克隆抗体、双特异性T细胞衔接抗体、嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T细胞,以及通过阻断PD1/PDL1或CTLA4进行的检查点阻断。AML治疗中常用的单克隆抗体靶向高表达的“白血病”表面抗原,包括(1)针对常见髓系标志物的裸抗体,如抗CD33(如林妥珠单抗),(2)与以下物质偶联的抗体-药物缀合物:(a)一种高效毒素,如加利车霉素、吡咯并苯二氮卓、美登素或其他用于各种抗CD33(吉妥珠单抗奥唑米星、SGN 33A)、抗CD123(SL-401)和抗CD56(洛伐他赛)制剂的毒素,或(b)放射性粒子,如I、Bi或Ac标记的抗CD33或CD45抗体。通过T细胞募集并促进肿瘤细胞邻近诱导的细胞毒性的新型单克隆抗体(双特异性T细胞衔接器[BiTE],如抗CD33/CD3,如AMG 330)或阻断免疫检查点途径,如CTLA4(如伊匹单抗)或PD1/PD-L1(如纳武单抗),从而释放患者的T细胞来对抗白血病细胞,正在AML患者的临床试验中进行评估。AML中众多正在进行的免疫疗法临床试验将增进我们对AML生物学的理解,并使我们能够确定AML免疫疗法的最佳方法。