Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China2Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
JAMA. 2017 Mar 21;317(11):1151-1158. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.1363.
The risk of osteoporotic fracture with dabigatran use in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is unknown.
To investigate the risk of osteoporotic fracture with dabigatran vs warfarin in patients with NVAF.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study using a population-wide database managed by the Hong Kong Hospital Authority. Patients newly diagnosed with NVAF from 2010 through 2014 and prescribed dabigatran or warfarin were matched by propensity score at a 1:2 ratio with follow-up until July 31, 2016.
Dabigatran or warfarin use during the study period.
Risk of osteoporotic hip fracture and vertebral fracture was compared between dabigatran and warfarin users using Poisson regression. The corresponding incidence rate ratio (IRR) and absolute risk difference (ARD) with 95% CIs were calculated.
Among 51 496 patients newly diagnosed with NVAF, 8152 new users of dabigatran (n = 3268) and warfarin (n = 4884) were matched by propensity score (50% women; mean [SD] age, 74 [11] years). Osteoporotic fracture developed in 104 (1.3%) patients during follow-up (32 dabigatran users [1.0%]; 72 warfarin users [1.5%]). Results of Poisson regression analysis showed that dabigatran use was associated with a significantly lower risk of osteoporotic fracture compared with warfarin (0.7 vs 1.1 per 100 person-years; ARD per 100 person-years, -0.68 [95% CI, -0.38 to -0.86]; IRR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.66]). The association with lower risk was statistically significant in patients with a history of falls, fractures, or both (dabigatran vs warfarin, 1.6 vs 3.6 per 100 person-years; ARD per 100 person-years, -3.15 [95% CI, -2.40 to -3.45]; IRR, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.33]), but not in those without a history (0.6 vs 0.7 per 100 person-years; ARD per 100 person-years, -0.04 [95% CI, 0.67 to -0.39]; IRR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.45 to 1.96]) (P value for interaction, <.001).
Among adults with NVAF receiving anticoagulation, the use of dabigatran compared with warfarin was associated with a lower risk of osteoporotic fracture. Additional study, perhaps including randomized clinical trials, may be warranted to further understand the relationship between use of dabigatran vs warfarin and risk of fracture.
重要性:在非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者中,达比加群的使用与骨质疏松性骨折的风险尚不明确。
目的:研究 NVAF 患者中达比加群与华法林相比发生骨质疏松性骨折的风险。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项使用香港医院管理局管理的全人群数据库进行的回顾性队列研究。2010 年至 2014 年新诊断为 NVAF 并接受达比加群或华法林治疗的患者,按倾向评分以 1:2 的比例进行匹配,并随访至 2016 年 7 月 31 日。
暴露:研究期间达比加群或华法林的使用。
主要结局和测量:使用泊松回归比较达比加群和华法林使用者骨质疏松性髋部骨折和椎体骨折的风险。计算了相应的发病率比(IRR)和 95%CI 内的绝对风险差异(ARD)。
结果:在 51496 例新诊断为 NVAF 的患者中,8152 例新使用达比加群(n=3268)和华法林(n=4884)的患者按倾向评分进行了匹配(50%为女性;平均[SD]年龄 74[11]岁)。在随访期间,有 104 例(1.3%)患者发生了骨质疏松性骨折(达比加群组 32 例[1.0%];华法林组 72 例[1.5%])。泊松回归分析结果显示,与华法林相比,达比加群的使用与骨质疏松性骨折风险显著降低相关(每 100 人年 0.7 比 1.1;每 100 人年 ARD,-0.68[95%CI,-0.38 至-0.86];IRR,0.38[95%CI,0.22 至 0.66])。在有跌倒、骨折或两者病史的患者中,这种关联具有统计学意义(达比加群与华法林相比,每 100 人年分别为 1.6 和 3.6;每 100 人年 ARD,-3.15[95%CI,-2.40 至-3.45];IRR,0.12[95%CI,0.04 至 0.33]),但在无上述病史的患者中则不具有统计学意义(达比加群与华法林相比,每 100 人年分别为 0.6 和 0.7;每 100 人年 ARD,-0.04[95%CI,0.67 至-0.39];IRR,0.95[95%CI,0.45 至 1.96])(P 值<0.001)。
结论和相关性:在接受抗凝治疗的 NVAF 成年患者中,与华法林相比,达比加群的使用与骨质疏松性骨折风险降低相关。可能需要进一步的研究,包括随机临床试验,以进一步了解达比加群与华法林的使用与骨折风险之间的关系。