Suppr超能文献

60岁及以上特定患者的心脏移植:一项二十年回顾性多中心分析

Heart transplantation in selected patients aged 60 years and older: a two-decade retrospective and multicentre analysis.

作者信息

Bosseau Christian, Lelong Bernard, Pattier Sabine, Trochu Jean-Noël, Roussel Jean-Christian, Sirinelli Agnès, Aupart Michel, Chabanne Céline, Dorent Richard, Cantrelle Christelle, Mabo Philippe, Leclercq Christophe, Verhoye Jean-Philippe, Flécher Erwan

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and CIC-IT 804, CHU Rennes, France.

Department of Cardiac Surgery and Heart Transplantation Unit, CHU Rennes, France.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 May 1;51(5):893-901. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx040.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study analysed survival and long-term outcomes of heart transplantation in patients aged 60 years and older. We also analysed the impact of a national graft allocation priority [Super Emergency (SE)] and compared survival with younger patients in our centres and in France.

METHODS

We performed a multicentre (University Hospitals in Nantes, Rennes and Tours), 2-decade retrospective study between 1 January 1994 and 31 December 2013. Elderly recipients were placed on the same list as younger patients; the use of marginal donors remained occasional.

RESULTS

A total of 212 patients aged between 60 and 68 years were included. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 83.2%, 77.4% and 63.8%, respectively, which were significantly worse than those of recipients aged <60 years (1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates of 87.3%, 80.4% and 68.0%, respectively). The postoperative course was acceptable. The main cause of death was malignancy (29.8% in our cohort). Survival was similar between the first and second decades and among the SE group. Our population exhibited better survival than patients <60 years transplanted in France during the same period with 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates of 76.8%, 68.0% and 56.3%, respectively. Predictors of survival in the multivariate analysis included ischaemic cardiomyopathy [hazard ratio (HR) 4.1] and postoperative complications, such as dialysis (HR 9.5) and mechanical circulatory support (HR 4.2).

CONCLUSIONS

We report positive postoperative course and long-term outcomes after heart transplantation in older recipients using conventional donors. Our satisfactory outcomes may be explained by the stringent selection of recipients combined with regular follow-up.

摘要

目的

本研究分析了60岁及以上患者心脏移植的生存率和长期预后。我们还分析了国家移植器官分配优先权[超级紧急(SE)]的影响,并将我们中心以及法国的老年患者与年轻患者的生存率进行了比较。

方法

我们进行了一项多中心(南特、雷恩和图尔的大学医院)、为期20年的回顾性研究,时间跨度为1994年1月1日至2013年12月31日。老年受者与年轻患者在同一等待名单上;边缘供体的使用仍属偶然。

结果

共纳入212例年龄在60至68岁之间的患者。1年、5年和10年生存率分别为83.2%、77.4%和63.8%,明显低于年龄小于60岁的受者(1年、5年和10年生存率分别为87.3%、80.4%和68.0%)。术后过程可以接受。主要死亡原因是恶性肿瘤(在我们的队列中占29.8%)。第一个十年和第二个十年以及SE组之间的生存率相似。我们的研究人群的生存率高于同期在法国接受移植的年龄小于60岁的患者,其1年、5年和10年生存率分别为76.8%、68.0%和56.3%。多变量分析中的生存预测因素包括缺血性心肌病[风险比(HR)4.1]以及术后并发症,如透析(HR 9.5)和机械循环支持(HR 4.2)。

结论

我们报告了使用常规供体的老年受者心脏移植术后良好的过程和长期预后。我们令人满意的结果可能是由于对受者的严格选择以及定期随访。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验